Evaluation of the safety of two types of pancreatojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy
姚亚东,马强,侯晓翔,阎于珂,张晖汉,徐小东,张有成,何晓东
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-631X.2016.11.019
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the safety of duct-to-mucosa and invaginating pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.Methods Randomized controlled trials comparing duct-to-mucosa with invagination pancreaticojejunostomy following PD were searched,through Datebases CSCD,PubMed,The Cochrane Library,Web of Science and EMBASE,Outcome measures included postoperative pancreatic fistula,mortality,intra-abdominal collection,delayed gastric emptying,overall morbidity,postoperative hemorrhage and reoperation,the statistical analysis was done by RevMan5.3 soft ware.Results A total of 8 trials,1 194 patients,were included in this Meta-analysis,No statistical difference were found in postoperative pancreatic fistula(OR =1.31,95％ CI:0.95-1.79,P =0.10),Pancreatic fistula with soft texture of the pancreas (OR =1.64,95％ CI:0.77-3.48,P =0.20),mortality (OR =1.02,95％ CI:0.46-2.26,P =0.97) and postoperative hemorrhage (OR =1.13,95％ CI:0.47-2.71,P =0.78) between duct-to-mucosa and invaginating pancreatojejunostomy.There were nor significant differences in overall morbidity,intra-abdominal collection,delayed gastric emptying and reoperation between the two groups.Conclusions The Meta-analysis based on 8 randomized controlled trials shows that the safety of the two reconstruction techniques is comparable.For soft texture of the pancreas,invaginated pancreatojejunostomy did not show a statistically significant superiority.Therefore,the surgeon should choose a reasonable reconstruction technique according to the results of the comprehensive evaluation of the patients.