Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To develop and evaluate scaling and scoring assumptions, and the reliability and the validity of a Chinese version of the SF-36 scales.METHODS:A multi-stage mixed sampling procedure was used to select a representative sample of the general population. The sample size was 1 000 households. All family members of a selected household, aged 18 and older, completed a survey by self-administration. Formal psychometric methods for testing assumptions underlying item scoring and scale construction were used according to the standard procedure of the IQOLA Project.RESULTS:Of the 1 985 collected questionnaires, 1 972 were qualified. Of them, 1 688 (85.6%) were respondents. 1 316 respondents answered all 36 items, while the remaining (372 respondents) answered with one or several missing responses. Among the non-respondents, 65.5% were illiteracy or quasi-illiteracy. The assumption of equal intervals was violated for the VT and MH scales. The recoded item values were used to calculate scale scores. The clustering and ordering of the item means were approximately the same as that of the source version and other two Chinese versions. The items in each scale had similar standard deviations except those in the PF, BP, SF scales. The correlations between an item and its hypothesized scale were identical for all except the SF and VT scales. The scaling success rates of convergent validity were 0% for the SF scale, 75% for the VT scale, and 100% for the other six scales. The scaling success rates of discriminat validity ranged from 87.5% to 100% for all scales except for the SF scale. The Cronbach' alpha coefficients of internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.72 to 0.88, which were satisfactory for group comparison except 0.39 for the SF scale and 0.66 for the VT scale. The two-weeks test-retest reliability coefficient ranged from 0.66 to 0.94. Factor analysis identified two principal components: a "physical" factor and a "mental" factor. Taken together, these two factors could be used to explain 56.3% of the total variance.CONCLUSION:The Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scale has achieved conceptual equivalence and satisfied the psychometric scaling assumptions well enough to warrant wide use in China. Known-groups validity will give more meaningful evidences of the validity of the Chinese SF-36 scales.

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Atrial Fibrillation-Quality of Life-18

Translation, Revision and Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale

[Reliability and Validity of a Short-Form Health Survey Scale (SF-36), Chinese Version Used in an Elderly Population of Zhejiang Province in China].

Development And Validation Of A Questionnaire To Assess The Quality Of Life In Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease In Mainland China

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Chronic Heart Failure Health-related Quality of Life Questionnaire (CHFQOLQ-20)

[Reliability and Validity of a Chinese Version of the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31-P)].

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Anticoagulation Knowledge Tool in patients with atrial fibrillation

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Comprehensive Frailty Assessment Instrument

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

Development and initial validation of the chronic hepatitis B quality of life instrument (CHBQOL) among Chinese patients

Translation and reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis-Specific Quality of Life-Short Form

The Chinese Language Version of the Abbreviated Burn Specific Health Scale: a Validation Study.

The reliability and validity of Chinese version of SF36 v2 in aging patients with chronic heart failure

Development and validation of the rheumatoid arthritis scale among the system of quality of life instruments for chronic diseases QLICD-RA (V2.0)

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of the Short Form of Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire for Elderly Patients

Chinesization of the Quality of Life Assessment, Venous Device-Port, and Its Reliability and Validity Tests for Patients with Breast Cancer.

Validation of the Chinese Version of the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Health-Related Quality of Life

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illness, and Loss for elder inpatients

Development and testing of the reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the Long-Term Conditions Questionnaire

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the traditional Chinese Food Allergy Quality of Life-Parental Burden questionnaire into simplified Chinese for use in mainland China

Translation and Validation of 17‐item Wound‐QoL Questionnaire in a Chinese Population