Motor recovery of the paraplegic hand after stroke: A longitudinal functional MRI study
SQ Huang,BL Liang,YD Wang,JL Zhong,ZG Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2007.22.002
2007-01-01
Abstract:AIM: To investigate the motor recovery of the paretic hands in post-stroke patients through a longitudinal functional MRI (fMRI) study. METHODS: The experiment adopted 11 stroke patients who were admitted in Department of Neurology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University between December 2003 and February 2006, with their informed consents. Using CT or MRI, they were diagnosed as cerebral infarction and hemorrhage involved in motor cortex, internal capsule, basal ganglia or brain stem. The grip strength of lesioned hands reduced to 4- grade or below at onset, then recovered to over 4+ grade at convalescence stage, followed by the fMRI studies that were done at two and six months after stroke respectively. Simultaneously 15 healthy examinees at right handedness were taken as normal control group and also performed fMRI examination, including 7 cases in bilateral hands and 8 cases in right hands. Evaluation: ①Non-quantitative index was consisted of the activation location, appearance, scope and distribution in both sides of primary sensorimotor cortex (SM1), the activation rate of premotor cortex (PM), supplementary motor area (SMA), cingulate motor areas (CMA) and non-motor area.②Quantitative index: Activation volume of SM1 was calculated as the addition of activation volumes of each layer in SM1 area measured by region of interest (ROI)×layer thickness. Lateral index = (activation volume of contralateral SM1-activation volume of ipsilateral SM1)/(activation volume of contralateral SM1+activation volume of ipsilateral SM1). RESULTS: ①fMRI analysis of SM1 area in normal group: Activation area in patched or irregular shape was found in 2-6 layers above lateral ventricle of pre-postcentral gyri, and there were not the same activation between left and right hands, and among different individuals. However, no significant difference was present in the activation volume and lateral index of both hands (P > 0.05).②fMRI analysis of non-SM1 and non-motor area in normal group: Compared with SM1, the activation area of non-SM1 and non-motor area was obviously reduced. The activation rate was the highest in PM whereas the lowest in CMA, additionally much lower or disappeared in other motor areas, except temporal lobe and occipital lobe.③fMRI analysis of paretic hands after stroke: The MRI appearances of activation at both sides of SM1 were similar to that of normal group in longitudinal fMRI studies at 2, 6 months after stroke. The activation volumes in contralateral SM1 of paretic hands were similar to that of normal group, but that in ipsilateral SM1 was larger than that of normal group at 2 months. The lateral index of lesioned hands was smaller at 2 months than that at 6 months after stroke; no significant difference was found (P > 0.05).④Patients at 2 months of stroke: The activation volume in contralateral SM1 of paretic hands was identical with that of normal group (P > 0.05), but that in ipsilateral SM1 was significantly larger than that of normal group [(997±704), (195±152) mm3; (1 661±962), (352±399) mm3, t =4.312, 3.240, P < 0.05]. The lateral index of both hands was significantly lower than that of normal group (0.258±0.679, 0.853±0.104; 0.042±0.553, 0.726±0.299, t =-3.405, -3.285, P < 0.05).⑤Patients at 6 months of stroke: The activation volumes in contralateral SM1 of paretic hands were similar to that of normal group (P > 0.05), but larger than that of normal group in ipsilateral SM1 [(717±915), (195±152) mm3], with significant statistical difference for right paretic hands (t =2.201, P < 0.05) and with no significant statistic difference for left paretic hands (P > 0.05). The lateral index of both hands was lower than that of normal group, and there was no significant difference (P > 0.05).⑥fMRI analysis of paretic hands in non-SM1 and non-motor area: The activation volume of non-SM1 and non-motor area was smaller than that of SM1, and the activation rate of bilateral PM and CMA was higher at 2 months than at 6 months in non-SM1; Compared with activation rate at 6 months, the SMA presented higher activation rate in right hands at 2 months, whereas lower rate in left hands. In non-motor area, the rate was higher in left temporal lobe, left prefrontal and left parietal regions, but lower in thalamus and ganglia. Generally the difference was not significant between 2 months and 6 months after stroke. CONCLUSION: For the post-stroke recovered patients, the contralateral SM1 activation volume is normal and stable in the early stage (2 months after stroke), but complemental phenomenon can be still found in the ipsilateral SM1 in the same stage, which disappears in the late stage (6 months).