[Effect of Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor on the Mammalian Target of Sirolimus Signaling Pathway in the Wound of Rat].
Wen-hui Cui,Hong Huang,Xiang Xu,Min Guo,Hui Dai,Yu Jian,Wei Guo,Wei Xing,Jian-xin Jiang,Rong Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2012.01.009
2012-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To investigate the effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) on wound healing and mammalian target of sirolimus (rapamycin) signaling pathway in rats. METHODS Fifty SD rats were divided into control group (n = 25) and treatment group (n = 25) according to the random number table. All rats were inflicted with 2 cm × 2 cm full-thickness skin wound on the back. Recombinant human GM-CSF gel (10 µg/cm(2)) was applied onto the wounds in treatment group, and the actual quantity was 1 × 10(-4) µg/cm(2). Gel vehicle (10 µg/cm(2)) without any medicine was applied onto the wounds in control group. The treatment was conducted once a day up to the day of wound healing. Five rats from two groups were sacrificed on post injury day (PID) 1, 3, 5, 7, 14 respectively to observe and determine the wound healing rate. Wound tissue samples were collected at the former 4 time points to observe the histopathological changes with HE staining, and to detect the content of GM-CSF with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and the expression levels of GM-CSF, CD31, and the mTOR signal pathway associated molecules P70S6K, phosphorylated (p-) P70S6K, 4E-BP1, p-4E-BP1, mTOR, p-mTOR with Western blotting. Data were processed with t test. RESULTS (1) Wound healing rates in control group and treatment group were close on PID 1 (t = 0.307, P > 0.05). Wound healing rate in treatment group was obviously higher than that in control group on PID 3, 5, 7, and 14 (with t values from 2.704 to 4.030, P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). (2) Compared with those in control group, more abundant granulation tissue was observed in treatment group, in which an increase in the number of microvessels and obvious proliferation of keratinized epithelial cells in wound margin were observed at each time point. (3) The content and the protein expression level of GM-CSF peaked on PID 3 in two groups, and they were (720.9 ± 0.9) pg/mL, 2.45 ± 0.10 in control group and (910.5 ± 1.3) pg/mL, 2.80 ± 0.48 in treatment group. The content of GM-CSF in treatment group was significantly higher than that in control group at each time point (with t values from 105.743 to 298.971, P values all equal to 0.000). The protein expression level of GM-CSF in treatment group was significantly higher than that in control group on PID 1, 5, and 7 (with t values from 4.070 to 5.275, P values all below 0.01). (4) The expression level of CD31 in treatment group was obviously higher than that in control group on PID 1, 3, and 7 (with t values from 7.237 to 26.401, P values all below 0.01). (5) The expression levels of mTOR and p-mTOR in treatment group were significantly higher than those in control group at each time point (with t values from 2.921 to 23.143, P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). In treatment group, the expression level of P70S6K was obviously higher than that in control group on PID 3, 5, and 7 (with t values from 2.950 to 5.275, P < 0.05 or P < 0.01), and the expression level of p-P70S6K was significantly higher than that in control group on PID 1, 3, and 7 (with t values from 3.307 to 22.793, P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). In treatment group, the expression level of 4E-BP1 was significantly lower than that in control group on PID 1, 3, and 5 (with t values from 2.449 to 6.431, P < 0.05 or P < 0.01), but the expression level of p-4E-BP1 was significantly higher than that in control group on PID 1, 3, and 7 (with t values from 5.522 to 11.613, P values all below 0.01). CONCLUSIONS GM-CSF can promote wound healing in rats by activating mTOR signaling pathway through phosphorylating mTOR proteins and its downstream signal molecules P70S6K and 4E-BP1.