Photodynamic Therapy Versus Primary and Secondary Intravitreal Bevacizumab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

FENG Xue-feng,Ian J Constable
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-4443.2010.07.013
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with primary intravitreal bevacizumab (ⅣB) and secondary ⅣB following multiple sessions of PDT in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).Methods Consecutive retrospective comparative case series were conducted in neovascular AMD patients treated at the Lions Eye Institute,Western Australia,from October 1999 to September 2007.All patients were monitored monthly and retreated on an"as needed"basis.Ophthalmic evaluation included best corrected Snellen visual acuity (VA),complete ophthalmic examination,fluorescein angiography,or optical coherence tomography.The main outcome measures were changes in Snellen VA with arbitrary definition of treatment efficacy and angiographic lesion characteristics.Results Six hundred and seventy-two patients received treatment;503 patients with at least 3 months (3-94.1 months,mean 23.5 months,median 13.8 months) follow up were included in the analysis.25.6% patients (60 out of 234 patients) benefited from PDT treatment,while 39.2% (31 out of 79 patients ) benefited from secondary ⅣB after PDT and 66.8% (127out of 190 patients) benefited from primary ⅣB.Adjusted odds ratio (OR) of treatment benefit for primary ⅣB and secondary ⅣB following PDT versus PDT alone were 5.17 (95%CI=3.10.8-59) and 1.71 (95%CI=0.93-3.13) respectively;P<0.001.Pre-treatment VA and subretinal scar tissue were negatively associated with treatment efficacy.No association was found between lesion composition,lesion size and treatment efficacy.Conclusions Primary ⅣB injection is more efficient than secondary injection after multiple sessions of PDT or PDT alone in treating neovascular AMD.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?