Comparison of Titanium Elastic Nail and Reconstruction Plate in Treatment of Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures

陈云丰,张睿,张弛,魏海峰,唐剑飞,杨发民,曾炳芳,张长青,柴益民
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2010.11.002
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical results of titanium elastic nail (TEN) and reconstruction plate (RP) in the treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. Methods From January 2005 to July 2007, 141 patients with displaced midshaft clavicular fractures were treated in our hospital with TEN or RP fixation. We compared the clinical results of the 2 groups in terms of general condition, postoperative complications and disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) and Constant Scores at 6 and 24 months postoperatively. Results The mean radiographic bone union time for TEN patients was ( 12.4 ± 3.4) weeks and ( 14. 4 ± 3.7) weeks for RP patients. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in nonunion or malunion. Mild migration of implants occurred in 17 TEN patients, but without any symptom in most cases. The DASH scores were significantly lower for TEN group than for RP group at 6 months ( P <0.05 ), while the Constant scores were significantly higher ( P < 0. 05). There was no significant difference at 24 months between the 2 groups in DASH or Constant scores ( P > 0. 05). TEN Patients were more satisfied with their cosmetic appearance and overall outcome than RP patients. Conclusion TEN fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures allows for a more rapid return to daily activities, better functional outcome, higher patient satisfaction and more cosmetically satisfactory appearance than RP fixation. The complication rates of TEN and RP are similar.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?