The diagnostic value of PET/CT on solid pulmonary lesions

王中秋,吴江,朱虹,常林风,陈英鑫,卢光明
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9780.2009.01.008
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective The aim of this paper was to evaluate the diagnostic value of PET/CT with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) for solid pulmonary lesions and the relationship between tumor size and maximum standardized uptake value SUVmax of lesions. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 85 cases of patients with solid pulmonary lesions (59 malignant, 26 benign). And 68/85 cases were confirmed pathologically by surgery or needle-biopsy and the other 17 cases by clinical follow-up after treatment. The shape, density, size of pulmonary lesions, and metastasis were surveyed based on CT findings. The SUVmax in region of interest (ROI) of pulmonary lesions were calculated on PET study. Imaging information were interpreted and compared with the histopathology findings or with clinical follow-up results. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of PET alone, CT alone and PET/CT scan were calculated. The tumor size on CT scan and SUVmax of lesions on PET scan were comparatively analyzed with Pearson correlation coefficient. Results In 85 cases of solid pulmonary lesions, The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of malignant pathology detection were respectively 89.8% (53/59), 61.5% (16/26), 81.2% (69/85) for PET alone; 88.1% (52/59), 65.4% (17/26), 81.2% (69/85) for CT alone, and 96.6% (57/59), 80.8% (21/ 26), 91.8% (78/85) for PET/CT scan. The tumor size of pulmonary malignant neoplasm in 59 patients correlated well with the SUVmax of the tumor (r=0.617, P <0.001). The size of pulmonary benign lesion in 26 patients did not have significant correlation with the SUVmax of the lesions (r=0.211, P>0.05). Conclusions PET/CT is of greater value in the differential diagnosis of solid pulmonary pathology than PET alone or CT alone. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy are significantly improved by PET/CT scan. The lesion size is found positively correlated with SUVmax of tuner in malignant neoplasm, but not in benign lesions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?