Correlation Between Cerebellar Retraction and Hearing Loss Following Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm

Li Ning,Guan Feng,Zhao Weiguo,Pu Chunhua,Yang Wenlei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2346.2018.06.017
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the relationship between cerebellar retraction and postoperative hearing loss of microvascular decompression (MVD) for hemifacial spasm (HFS).Methods The study included 130 patients clinically diagnosed as primary HFS who underwent MVD at Neurosurgery Department of Rui Jin Hospital,Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine from March to September of 2016.The cerebellar retraction (retraction depth and distance) were quantitatively measured on preoperative MRTA (magnetic resonance tomographic angiography).Pre-and postoperative auditory functions were assessed by pure tone average (PTA).Postoperative hearing dysfunction was defined as the postoperative PTA >50 dB combined with a decrease of PTA ≥ 15 dB compared with preoperative conditions.Correlation of cerebellar retraction with postoperative hearing loss was analyzed by uni-and multivariate statistical methods.Results HFS was completely disappeared in 112 (86.2%) patients,spasm of musculus facialis was occasionally appeared in 10 (7.7%) patients,HFS was partly alleviated in 8 (6.1%) patients.Among those 130 cases,12 (9.2%) patients developed hearing dysfunction post MVD.Univariate analysis showed that the retraction depth in hearing loss group was significantly greater than that in cases without hearing loss (P <0.001),whereas there was no significant difference in gender,age,HFS side or retraction distance between the 2 groups (all P >0.05).Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that cerebellar retraction depth was significantly associated with the incidence of postoperative hearing loss (P =0.001).Conclusions The results have suggested the correlation between cerebellar retraction depth and likelihood of hearing loss following MVD for HFS.In addition,cerebellar retraction depth could be considered as a useful tool for risk prediction of hearing loss post MVD.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?