UItrasound Guiding Puncture Biopsy of Solid Tumors in Children

LI Kai,DONG Kui-ran,CHEN Lian,YAO Wei,HE Wei-jing,XIAO Xian-min
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3006.2012.07.009
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To present the experience of ultrasound guiding subcutaneous puncture biopsy in diagnosis of chlidren's solid tumors.Methods From May 2009 to May 2010,32 patients who underwent tumor biopsy were recrnited in this study.Among them,17 underwent ultrasound guiding subcutaneous puncture biopsy,and the other 15 were performed open biopsy.The tumor location,size,image,achievement ratio,incision,pathology,anesthesia,operating time,complications and surgery cost were retrospectively analyzed and compared.Results Ultrasound guiding subcutaneous puncture biopsy was chosen for the patients with retroperitoneal tumor.And open biopsy was the indication for pelvic tumor.Preoperative evaluation suggested patients' tumor couldn't be completely removed by one stage surgery.Enough tissue volume was obtained by both of the 2 procedures.And postoperative pathological diagnosis was identical with the biopsy results.There was no incision on the patients with puncture biopsy,while the incision length in open biopsy group was 5.6 ±1.1 cm.The anesthesia and operation time of puncture biopsy were significantly shorter than those of open biopsy (32.0 ± 7.3 min vs 52.3 ± 14.9 ain,P =0.000).The postoperative recovery time of puncture biopsy was significantly shorter than that of open biopsy(7.1 ± 4.3 h vs 75.2 ± 12.3 h,P=0.000).The cost of puncture biopsy was significantly less than that of open biopsy ( 102l.2 ± 113.2 yuan vs 3047.2 ±237.6 yuan,P =0.000).Conclusions Simple,minimal invasive,short hospital stay,low cost,less bleeding,quick recovery are the obvious advantages of puncture biopsy.UItrasound guiding biopsy is accurate and safe to get enough tissue to make accurate diagnosis of solid tumor in children.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?