Pilot Study of Double Contrast Ultrasonography for Pathological Typing of Advanced Gastric Cancer

XUE Nian-yu,HUANG Pin-tong,LI Shi-yan,ZHAO Ya-ping,HUANG Fu-guang,ZHENG Zhi-qiang,WANG Zong-min

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4477.2009.08.019

2009-01-01

Abstract:usions DCUS could initial estimate the pathological typing of advanced gastric caner before operation.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Pilot study of double contrast ultrasonography for differentiation degree of gastric cancer

Yan-ping LI,Pin-tong HUANG,Yan YANG,Shi-yan LI,Liang WANG,Zhi-lin ZHAO,Fu-guang HUANG,Zhi-qiang ZHENG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1004-4477.2008.10.012

2008-01-01

Abstract:Objective To investigate the value of oral and intravenous contrast enhanced ultrasonography-double contrast ultrasonography (DCUS) in the evaluation of differentiation degree of gastric cancer. Methods Fifty-three patients who had been diagnosed as gastric cancer by gastroscope and confirmed by pathology after operation were examined by DCUS, and they were divided into moderately to well differentiated group and poorly differentiated group. The correlation of size and enhancement features of the lesions was compared with differentiation degree of gastric cancer. Results The size and enhancement distribution of lesions were markedly correlated with the degree of differentiation. The baseline intensity(BI)in poorly differentiated group was lower than that in well and moderately differentiated group[(0.52±1.12)dB vs (1.53±1.87) dB, P<0.05], but enhanced intensity(EI) was higher than that in the second group [(26.22±3.69)dB vs (23.69±5.02)dB, P<0.05]. Conclusions DCUS could initial evaluate the degree of differentiation of gastric cancer before operation.
A pilot study on Lauren classification of advanced gastric carcinoma using double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography

Shi-yan LI,Pin-tong HUANG,Yan-ping LI,Liang WANG,Fu-guang HUANG,Zhi-qiang ZHENG,Zong-min WANG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1004-4477.2008.12.008

2008-01-01

Abstract:Objective To investigate the clinical value of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCUS)in diagnosing Lauren classification of advanced gastric carcinoma.Methods Fifty-eight patients with gastric cancer proved by endoscopic biopsy underwent preoperative DCUS examination,and the findings were compared with postoperative pathologic results via hematoxylin-eosin and alcian blue-periodic acid schiff(AB-PAS)staining.Results In 58 patients,34 cases were diagnosed as intestinal type and 24 cases as diffuse type by pathology after operation.In intestinal type,30 cases were enhanced as global homogeneous intensity by using DCUS.another 2 cases as"lamellar"model and the other 2 cases as heterogeneous intensity.However,in diffuse type,22 cases were enhanced heterogeneously with"barrier"signs in 5 cases,"map"signs in 9 cases and"lamellar"signs in 8 cases.the remaining 2 cases of diffuse type enhanced as homogeneous model.The sensitivity and specificity of heterogeneous enhancement in diagnosing diffuse type of advanced gastric cancer was 91.7%and 88.2%respectively,and the Youden's index was 0.8.Conclusions DCUS could be considered as a new valuable method to distinguish the Lauren classification and evaluate the invasiveness,metastasis and prognosis in patients with gastric carcinoma.
Value of Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in the Preoperative TN Staging for Gastric Cancer

YU Yao-jun,LU Ming-dong,WANG Fei-hai,SUN Wei-jian,LI Pi-hong,HUANG He,ZHENG Zhi-qiang,LIN Li-miao,HUANG Ping-tong,CHEN Jian-min,ZHANG Hai-yan,XIE Zuo-kai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-631x.2010.07.014

2010-01-01

Abstract:Objective To compare the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with double contrast enhanced ultrasound ( DCUS) in the preoperative staging of gastric malignancies. Methods This study included 162 patients with biopsy proven gastric cancer who underwent surgical resection as primary management of their malignancies. All patients underwent DCUS and EUS prior to surgical intervention with the results of the ultrasound findings compared with the pathological stages of the resected specimen. Results Among the 162 gastric cancer patients, there were 42 cases of T1, 49 cases of T2, 56 cases of T3, and 15 cases of T4 tumors. The overall accuracy of DCUS and EUS for the determination of loco-regional tumor infiltration ( T Staging) was 77. 2% and 74. 7% , (χ2 = 0. 273, P = 0. 603). Comparison of ultrasound techniques revealed that DCUS was superior to EUS only for a tumor depth of T3 (χ2 =5. 009, P = 0.025). Lymph nodes were correctly staged with DCUS and EUS in 78.4% and 57. 4% of cases, respectively ( χ2 = 16. 370,P =0.001). Using DCUS, the sensitivity of the technique was 78. 4% with a specificity of 78. 5%. In comparison, EUS had a sensitivity of 49. 5% with a specificity of 69. 2%. DCUS also detected a higher incidence of positive lymph nodes than EUS for poorly differentiated (81. 5% vs. 42. 6% ,χ2 =17. 338, P < 0. 01) and overall tumor types (78.4% vs. 49. 5% , χ2 = 17.523, P < 0. 01). Conclusions Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography offers another noninvasive approach for the preoperative evaluation of gastric cancer. DCUS was comparable to EUS in tumor depth evaluation. DCUS offers an advantage in the detection of lymph node metastases, especially in poorly differentiated tumors.
Comparison of Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography and Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Preoperative Tstaging of Gastric Carcinoma

WANG Liang,HUANG Pin-tong,HUANG Fu-guang,HE Hui-liao,TAN Yan-juan,ZHENG Zhi-qiang,WANG Zong-min

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4477.2011.11.011

2011-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the accuracy of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography(DCUS) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in the preoperative T staging of gastric cancer.Methods A total of 136 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed gastric carcinoma were enrolled into this study.DCUS and EUS were performed in all patients to estimate depth of invasionin (T stage) before surgery.All patients underwent surgery.The findings of the histopathologic examination of resected specimens were considered as gold standard and were retrospectively compared with the results of DCUS and EUS.Results The accuracy of DCUS and EUS in determining the T stage of gastric cancer were 80.1％ ( T165.5 ％,T2 79.5％,T386.5％,T487.5％) and 81.60％ ( T182.8％,T276.9％,T382.7％,T487.5％) respectively.There was no significant difference between two methods ( P ＞0.05) except T1 staging.Conclusions There is no significant difference between DCUS and EUS in overall T-staging of gastric cancers,but there is a significant difference between two methods in T1 staging.Either of these two methods has its advantages and disadvantages.If two methods are carried out simultaneously to make up for each other,the accuracy of preoperative T-staging of gastric cancers can be improved and this improvement can influence treatment algorithms.
Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Evaluation of Preoperative Lauren Classification of Advanced Gastric Carcinoma

Pintong Huang,Shiyan Li,Wilbert S. Aronow,Zongmin Wang,Chandra K. Nair,Nianyu Xue,Xuedong Shen,Chengchun Chen,David Cosgrove

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2011.22080

2011-01-01

Archives of Medical Science

Abstract:Introduction The clinical value of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCUS) in determining the Lauren classification of advanced gastric carcinoma needed investigation. Material and methods Fifty-eight patients with gastric cancer proved by endoscopic biopsy underwent preoperative DCUS examination in which an oral contrast agent was combined with an intravenous agent, and the findings were compared with the postoperative pathological findings using haematoxylin-eosin and Alcian Blue-Periodic Acid Schiff (AB-PAS) staining. Results Of 58 patients, 34 (59%) were the intestinal type and 24 (41%) the diffuse type on pathological examination of resected specimens. Among intestinal type patients, 30 (88%) showed homogeneous vascular enhancement and 4 (12%) heterogeneous enhancement with the “sandwich” pattern in 2 patients (50%) and “barrier” pattern in 2 patients (50%). In the diffuse type, 22 of 24 patients (92%) enhanced heterogeneously, with stippled and peripheral enhancement in 9 (41%), the “sandwich” pattern in 8 (36%) and “barrier” pattern in 5 (23%). Two of 24 patients (8%) with the diffuse type enhanced homogeneously. The proportion of heterogeneous enhancement was significantly different between the 2 subtypes of tumour (p = 0.0001). The sensitivity and specificity of heterogeneous enhancement in diagnosing the diffuse type of advanced gastric cancer were 92% and 88%, respectively. Youden’s index was 0.8. Conclusions Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is a new and useful method to determine Lauren classification in patients with gastric carcinoma.
Preliminary clinical use of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis and preoperative staging of gastric cancer

CAO Chun-hui,HUANG Pin-tong,ZHENG Yi-xiong,LI Guo-guang,YI Yang,CHEN Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-7402.2011.04.007

2011-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the preliminary clinical use of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography using oral and intravenous contrast agents in diagnosis and preoperative staging of gastric cancer.Methods Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography using oral and intravenous contrast agents was performed in 13 patients with gastric cancer.The diagnosis and preoperative staging evaluated by double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography were compared with postoperative pathologic outcomes.Results The accuracy of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for diagnosis of gastric cancer was 100% including one case with early and 12 with advanced gastric carcinoma.The accuracy for tumor invasion depth(T staging) was 76.9%(10/13) including 3 incorrect cases with tumors located in the fundus and greater curvature of the stomach respectively.The accuracy for peri-gastric lymph node metastasis was 66.7%(2/3) and the overall coincidence of peri-gastric lymph node involvement or not was 92.3%(12/13).Conclusions Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is useful for diagnosis and preoperative staging of gastric cancer.The accuracy for clinical TNM staging is comparatively low for early gastric cancer and tumors located in the greater curvature and fundus of the stomach.
Application of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography to access the lymph nodes metastasis of gastric carcinoma

Shi-yan LI,Pin-tong HUANG,Hai-shan XU,Li-long XU,Jiang-hong L(U),Jin-duo SHOU,Bo-wen ZHAO

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4477.2010.06.014

2010-01-01

Abstract:Objective To investigate the clinical value of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCUS) in diagnosing lymph nodes metastasis of gastric carcinoma.Methods One hundred and sixteen patients with gastric cancer diagnosed by gastroscope and confirmed by pathology after operation were examined by DCUS preoperatively.The enhanced characteristic of gastric carcinoma tissues was assessed by autotracking contrast quantification(ACQ) software.The baseline intensity(BI), peak intensity(PI), arrival time(AT) and time to peak(TTP) of gastric cancer was measured automatically,and the enhanced intensity (EI) and wash-in time(WIT) of gastric cancer was calculated manually (EI=PI-BI; WIT=TTP-AT).All of the subjects were divided into two groups according to their lymph nodes status postoperatively:group N1,sixty-nine patients with lymph nodes metastasis; and group N0, forty-seven patients without lymph nodes metastasis.The DCUS quantitative analysis and pathological results of these two groups were compared each other.The Kappa's test was used for inter-rater reliability.Results BI of group N1 in the gastric carcinoma tissues was lower than that of group N0 significantly [(1.41 ± 1.56)dB vs (3.92 ± 2.82)dB, t = - 4.81, P = 0.000].EI of group N1 in the gastric carcinoma tissues was higher than that of group N0 significantly [(20.67±3.71)dB vs (14.12±3.75)dB, t=7.31, P=0.000].Moreover, there was a significant difference of WIT in the gastric carcinoma tissues between these two groups[(9.12±2.99)s vs (10.88±3.05)s, t =-2.43, P=0.018].The WIT in patients with lymph nodes metastasis was shorter than that without it. A cut-off value ＞17.05 dB of EI in gastric cancer tissues for assessing the lymph nodes metastasis had a sensitivity of 80.50% and specificity of 76.70% respectively obtained by the area under the ROC curve. The Kappa value of this method was 0.88.Conclusions EI of gastric cancer tissues can be considered as a new potential index to evaluate the lymph nodes metastasis of gastric cancer.
The value of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in Borrmann classification of advanced gastric carcinoma

Liang WANG,Pin-tong HUANG,Ya-ping ZHAO,Fu-guang HUANG,Yan-ping LI,Shi-yan LI,Zhi-qiang ZHENG,Zong-min WANG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1004-4477.2008.11.012

2008-01-01

Abstract:Objective To investigate the clinical value of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCUS)in Borrmann classification of advanced gastric carcinoma preoperatively. Methods A total of 69 patients with advanced gastric carcinoma were examined by ultrasound after taking oral contrast agent and bolus injection of SonoVue preoperatively.A comparison with final pathologic results was made after surgery. Results The accuracy of oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and DCUS in Borrmann classification of advanced gastric cancer were 78.3%and 91.3%,respectively.There was a significant difference between two methods(X2=4.087,P＜0.05).In addition,Kappa value of two methods were 0.73 and 0.90,respectively.Conclusions DCUS is a new valuable method for Borrmann classification with its high accuracy preoperatively.
Predicting Lymph Node Status In Patients With Early Gastric Carcinoma Using Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography

Nianyu Xue,Pintong Huang,Wilbert S Aronow,Zongmin Wang,Chandra K Nair,Zhiqiang Zheng,Xuedong Shen,Yimei Yin,Fuguang Huang,David Cosgrove

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2011.23412

2011-01-01

Archives of Medical Science

Abstract:Introduction: Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCUS) is a new method we used in predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with early gastric cancer.Material and methods: Seventy-six patients with early gastric cancer diagnosed by gastroscope and confirmed by pathology after operation were examined using DCUS preoperatively. Group N1 included 15 patients with LNM and group NO 61 patients without LNM.Results: In group N1, 13 patients (87%) had marked hyperenhancement during early arterial phase using DCUS, and 2 patients (13%) were unmarked as hyperenhancement. In group NO, 24 patients (39%) had marked hyperenhancement during early arterial phase using DCUS, and 37 patients (61%) had unmarked hyperenhancement. The sensitivity and specificity of marked hyperenhancement in predicting LNM in patients with early gastric cancer was 86.7% and 60.7% respectively, and the Youden's index was 0.474. The kappa value of this method was 0.89.Conclusions: Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is a new valuable method to evaluate LNM at an early stage of gastric cancer and prognosis of early gastric cancer preoperatively.
Clinical Value of Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Gastric Stromal Tumors

WANG Xiao-hua,HUANG Pin-tong,ZHAO Shu-dan,ZHAO Ya-ping,XUE Nian-yu,WANG Liang,ZHENG Zhi-qiang,WANG Zong-min

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4477.2010.10.013

2010-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate clinical value of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography(DCUS)in diagnosing gastric stromal tumors(GST). Methods The medical records of 26 patients with a histological diagnosis of GST were retrospectively reviewed. The correlation between DCUS features and pathological findings of the lesions was compared. Results Total 26 cases of GST were divided into low risk group( 16 cases) and high risk group (10 cases). The size,contour,liquefactive necrosis and enhancement distribution of lesions were markedly correlated with the pathobiologic behaviour of the tumor ( P ＜0.05). There was no significant difference in border and metastasis of lesions between two groups( P ＞0.05). It was shown that DCUS supplied statistically significant improvement in the localization diagnosis and detection of liquefactive necrosis versus oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography ( P ＜ 0.05 ). Conclusions DCUS is considered as a valuable tool in diagnosing location as well as pathobiological behaviour of GST. It can provide the guidance and reference comments for treatment algorithms.
Evaluation of the Chemotherapy Effect in Advanced Gastric Carcinoma Using Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography

TAN Yan-juan,HUANG Pin-tong,CHENG Ying,HU Rong,ZHAN Kun-gao,WANG Liang,HE Hui-liao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4477.2010.12.012

2010-01-01

Abstract:Objective To explore the clinical value of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCUS) on evaluation of the chemotherapy effect in advanced gastric carcinoma. Methods A total of 21 patients with unresectable and received chemotherapy of advanced gastric carcinoma were examined using ultrasound after taking oral contrast agent and bolus injection of Sono Vue, and findings of DCUS of each patient before and after chemotherapy were compared. Results The thickness of lesions was slightly thinner than that after chemotherapy,but there was no significant difference ( P ＞0. 05). In addition, there was no significant difference in the basal intensity (BI), peak intensity (PI), arrive time (AT) and time to peak (TTP) of gastric carcinoma tissues after chemotherapy (P ＞0.05). While the enhanced intensity (EI) value of gastric carcinoma tissues after chemotherapy was significantly less than that before chemotherapy (P ＜0.05). Conclusions The EI value in gastric carcinoma tissues may be considered as a sensitive and effective index in assessing the therapeutic effect of the chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric carcinoma.
Comparative Study of Double Contrast Ultrasonography with Enhanced Computed Tomography in Normal Gastric Wall

LI Yan-ping,HUANG Pin-tong,ZHAO Ya-ping,HUANG Fu-guang,YANG Yong-ming,ZHENG Zhi-qing,CHENG jian-min,GUO Xin-zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2138.2008.01.019

2008-01-01

Abstract:Objective: To explore the characteristics of normal gastric wall using oral and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasonography-Double Contrast Ultrasonograph(yDCUS). Methods: Four-teen healthy volunteers were enrolled in this study. The DCUS findings of normal gastric wall were compared with enchanced multi-slice spiral CT (MSCT). Results: Normal gastric wall presented as three layer structures from inside to outside with DCUS: a slightly enhanced inner layer corresponded histologically to the mucosal layer, an intermediate layer of low enhanced corresponded histologically to the submucosal layer,and a markedly enhanced outer layer corresponded histologically to the muscular-serosal layer. Conclusion: The normal gastric wall presents as three-layered structures using DCUS, which may provide a basic principle of DCUS in diagnosing T-staging of gastric cancer in the future.
[Comparison of Preoperative T Staging by Oral Contrast Enhanced Ultrasonography and Double Contrast Enhanced Ultrasonography in Advanced Gastric Carcinoma].

Rui-jie Chen,Pin-tong Huang,Yan-ping Li,Zhi-qiang Zheng,Ya-ping Zhao,Fu-guang Huang,Nian-yu Xue,Li Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2010.07.019

2010-01-01

Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To compare the accuracy of preoperative T staging of gastric cancer by oral and intravenous contrast-enhanced gastric ultrasonography.METHODS:One hundred and forty three patients who had been diagnosed as gastric cancer by endoscopic biopsy and confirmed by pathology after operation were examined by oral and intravenous contrast-enhanced gastric ultrasonography, and they were divided into satisfied group and non-satisfied group according to the 2-D image quality of lesion. The results were compared with postoperative pathologic findings.RESULTS:All the patients with gastric cancer presented regional gastric wall thickening. Among them, 117 cases were clearly presented with good image quality. The remaining 26 cases were presented with vague profile, the ulcerative surface of lesion was filled with hyperechogenicity combined with rear shadow. The accuracy of oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in determining the T stage of gastric cancer was 74.1%. The accuracy in satisfied group and non-satisfied group was 78.6% and 53.8%, respectively. The enhancement pattern of 143 cases was showed as hyperenhancement during the arterial phase and hypoenhancement during the portal phase in DCUS. The accuracy of double contrast-enhanced ultrasongraphy in determining the T stage of gastric cancer was 86.7%, but the accuracy in satisfied group and non-satisfied group was 88.9% and 76.9%, respectively. There was a significant difference between the two methods (χ(2) = 9.031, P < 0.01).CONCLUSION:DCUS is more accurate than oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography as a useful diagnostic method for preoperative T staging of gastric cancer.
The value of double contrast-enhanced unltrasonography in macroscopic classification of rectal carcinoma

PENG Cheng-zhong,HUANG Pin-tong,WANG Li,FAN Xiao-ming,MA Jie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2013.09.013

2013-01-01

Abstract:Objective To investigate the clinical value of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCUS) in the macroscopic classification of rectal carcinoma. Methods Seventy-one patients with rectal carcinoma were examined by ultrasound after intrarectal infusion and intravenous bolus injection of SonoVue preoperatively. And three types were divided according to the shape of the tumor: protruding type, ulcerative type and invasive type. After surgery, DCUS and perfusion contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (PCUS) were compared with final pathologic results respectively, and the relationship between general tumor type and TN staging were analyzed.Results The accuracy of DCUS [88.7% (63/71) ] in macroscopic classification of rectal carcinoma was significantly higher than that of PCUS [73.2% (52/71) ](χ2 =5.534,P < 0.05). For the invasion depth into the intestinal wall, the protruding type was mainly in T1 , T2 and T3 stages while ulcerative and invasive type in T2 , T3 and T4 stages (χ2 =12.322, P < 0.05). For the stage of lymph node, the protruding type was mainly in N0 and N1 while ulcerative and invasive type in N1 and N2 (χ2 =6.733,P < 0.05). Conclusions DCUS, with its high accuracy, is a new valuable method for macroscopic classification of rectal carcinoma.In the aspect of intestinal wall invasion and the lymph node, protruding type is less severe than ulcerative type and invasive type.
Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Preoperative Borrmann Classification of Advanced Gastric Carcinoma: Comparison with Histopathology

Minqiang Pan,Pintong Huang,Shiyan Li,Jian Chen,Shumei Wei,Ying Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03338

IF: 4.6

2013-01-01

Scientific Reports

Abstract:The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCEUS) for assessing the Borrmann classification of advanced gastric carcinoma (AGC) preoperatively. Three hundred twenty nine patients with proved AGC were enrolled. DCEUS (intravenous microbubbles combined with combined with oral contrast-enhanced ultrasound) was performed preoperatively. The diagnostic accuracy of DCEUS in determining Borrmann classification was compared with postoperative pathological findings. The reliability of DCEUS was analyzed. The accuracy of DCEUS in determining the Borrmann classification of AGC was 91.49%. The intra- and inter-observer reproducibility was both almost perfect for assessing the Borrmann classification of AGC by DCEUS. DCEUS could be considered as an accurate, non-invasive and reliable diagnostic method for preoperative Borrmann classification of advanced gastric carcinoma.
Evaluation of the T-restaging and Effect after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Gastric Carcinoma Using Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography

TAN Yan-juan,HUANG Pin-tong,HUANG An-qian,BAO Ling-yun,XU Liang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4477.2012.07.011

2012-01-01

Abstract:Objective To determine staging accuracy of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCUS)after neoadjuvant chemotherapy,and to evaluate effect during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric carcinoma(AGC).Methods A total of 29 patients with AGC diagnosed by endoscopy were examined and staged using ultrasound after taking oral contrast agent and bolus injection of SonoVue (DCUS)pre-and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy.T-stage accuracy of post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy and pathological T status of postoperative were compared.All of the subjects were divided into two groups according to RECIST(Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors):chemotherapy benefit group(22cases,including:complete response 0 cases.partial response 14 cases,stable disease 8 cases)and progressive group(7 cases).The findings of DCUS of AGC tissues were assessed by auto-tracking contrast quantification(ACQ)software.The baseline intensity(BI)and peak intensity(PI)of gastric carcinoma tissues were measured automatically,and the enhanced intensity(EI)of gastric carcinoma tissues was calculated manually(EI =PI-BI).The quantitative analysis findings of DCUS of each patient pre-and postneoadjuvant chemotherapy between two groups were compared adopting repeated measures method.Results The overall accuracy of T staging in AGC patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were 65.52％ by DCUS,and 0,42.86％and 92.86％respectively for T2 stage,T3 stage and T4 stage.The agreement of this method was weak between T-stage accuracy post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy and pathological T status of postoperative.The Kappa value was 0.33.The difference value of PI and EI between pre-and postneoadjuvant chemotherapy in AGC patients for benefit group was more than that in progressive group.The main effect of BI in AGC tissues between pre-and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy was no significant difference between two groups(P＞0.05).Conclusions Restaging by DCUS after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in AGC patients was found to be inaccurate.However,the difference value of PI and EI between pre-and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy in AGC tissues for benefit group was more than that in progressive group.Thus,the value of PI and EI by ICUS may be a useful clinical parameter with which to evaluate the effect during neoadjuvant chemotherapy and guide therapeutic regimen for AGC patients.
Preliminary application of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography to assess the peripancreatic vascular invasion of pancreatic carcinoma

Shi-yan LI,Pin-tong HUANG,Hai-shan XU,Li-long XU,Ke XU,Jiang-hong L(U),Bo-wen ZHAO

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4477.2012.03.010

2012-01-01

Abstract:Objective To investigate the clinical value of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCEUS) in assessing the peripancreatic vascular invasion of pancreatic carcinoma.Methods Twenty-eight patients with pancreatic cancer confirmed by postoperative pathology were examined by DCEUS preoperatively.The relationship between neoplasms and peripancreatic vessels was analyzed for assessing whether vascular invasion of pancreatic cancer had occurred.The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value and accuracy of DCEUS in evaluating vascular involvement were calculated by using the surgical results as a gold standard.Kappa test was used for assessing the intra- and interobserver reliability of DCEUS.Results In total 28 patients,21 cases were diagnosed as vascular invasion,whereas,7 cases were noninvasive by surgical results.By DCEUS,18 cases were assessed as positive involvement of vessels,whereas,10 cases were negative.The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value and accuracy of DCEUS in evaluating vascular involvement were 85.71 ％,100％,100 ％,70.00 ％ and 89.29 ％ respectively,and with higher reliability (Kappainter =0.75,Kappa =0.80).Conclusions DCEUS could be considered as a novel method to assess vascular invasion of pancreatic carcinoma accurately and reliably.
The relationship between enhanced intensity and microvessel density of gastric carcinoma using double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

Li Shiyan,Huang Pintong,Wang Zongmin,Huang Fuguang,Zheng Zhiqiang,Yang Yan,David Cosgrove

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.03.010

IF: 3.694

2009-01-01

Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology

Abstract:The purpose of this study was to assess the value of double contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCUS), in which intravenous microbubbles are used together with an oral contrast agent as a method to evaluate the microvascular density (MVD) of gastric cancer, and its relationship with the contrast-enhanced intensity (EI) in gastric carcinomas. Sixty-nine patients with gastric cancer were examined preoperatively using DCUS. The arrival time (AT), time-to-peak (TTP), peak (PI) and baseline (pre-injection) intensities (BI) of gastric carcinoma and normal gastric wall were measured. Contrast-enhanced intensity (PI minus BI) was calculated. A monoclonal antibody against CD34 was used to display vascular endothelial cells in the resected gastric carcinoma specimens and in normal gastric mucosal tissues, and MVD was calculated by counting CD34-positive vascular endothelial cells. The differences in AT, TTP, EI and MVD between gastric carcinoma specimens and normal gastric wall tissues were evaluated using Student's t-test. The relationships between EI and MVD in gastric cancer were analyzed by Spearman rank correlation analysis. Both EI and MVD were significantly higher in gastric carcinomas than in normal gastric wall (p<0.001). However, AT and TTP showed no significant differences between gastric carcinoma specimens and normal gastric wall tissues (p>0.05). There was a strong positive linear correlation between EI and MVD in gastric carcinoma (r=0.921, p<0.001). Double contrast-enhanced ultrasound is a useful method for evaluation of the MVD in gastric carcinomas in vivo. Contrast-enhanced intensity has a strong positive linear correlation with MVD and could form a new index for assessing angiogenesis and the biological behavior of gastric carcinomas. (E-mail: huangpintong@126.com)
Preoperative T Staging of Advanced Gastric Cancer Using Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.

S Li,P Huang,Z Wang,J Chen,H Xu,L Wang,Y Zhang,G Mo,J Zhu,D Cosgrove

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1312958

2012-01-01

Abstract:PURPOSE:To determine the accuracy of double contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCEUS), in which intravenous microbubbles are used together with an oral contrast agent, in the preoperative T staging of advanced gastric cancer.MATERIALS AND METHODS:This prospective, ethics committee-approved study recruited 350 patients who gave informed consent. All had gastric cancer proved by endoscopic biopsy and underwent preoperative ultrasound staging using the TNM classification (UICC 2002). The results of DCEUS were compared with postoperative pathologic findings. The staging accuracy of oral contrast-enhanced ultrasound (OCEUS) and DCEUS were compared to each other. Sensitivity and specificity for assessing serosal involvement by DCEUS were evaluated, and the concordance of this method was analyzed using Kappa statistics.RESULTS:The accuracies of OCEUS and DCEUS in determining the T stage of advanced gastric cancer were 75.1 % (70.4 % for T2, 79.5 % for T3, 68.1 % for T4) and 87.4 % (83.3 % for T2, 89.7 % for T3, 87.2 % for T4), respectively, and the difference between the two methods was statistically significant (χ2 = 17.364, p< 0.001). The performance of DCEUS for staging lesions in the cardia (69.81 %), fundus (85.71 %) and body (85.56 %) had lower accuracy than that of other parts (93.94 % for antrum; 92.11 % for pylorus). Sensitivity and specificity for assessing serosal involvement by DCEUS were 98.76 % and 83.33 % respectively. The reliability was almost perfect with Kappa values of 0.89 (p< 0.001) for intra-observer and 0.82 (p< 0.001) for inter-observer agreement.CONCLUSION:DCEUS could be considered as an accurate, non-invasive, and reliable diagnostic method for preoperative staging of advanced gastric cancer.
Assessment of Liver Metastasis in Patients with GastricCancer Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Quantitative Analysis

薛念余,黄品同,张海平,郑志强

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-0101.2010.03.018

2010-01-01

Abstract:Objective To investigate the value of oral and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (i.e.double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography,DCUS) as a new method to evaluate the gastric cancer in patients with liver metastasis using DCUS.Methods One hundred and forty one patients with gastric cancer proved by endoscopic biopsy underwent DCUS examination and were enrolled in this study,and they were divided into metastatic group(M1:22 cases) and non-metastatic group(M1:119 cases) according to whether with the liver metastasis or not.The DCUS quantitative analysis results of these two groups were compared with each other.Results There was no significant difference in arrival time(AT) and time to peak(TTP) between M1 and M0 group(P>0.05).The peak intensity(PI) and enhanced intensity(EI) of the gastric cancer tissues in M1 group was higher than that in M0 group significantly [PI:(25.61±3.33) dB vs.(21.51±4.14) dB,t＝5.106,P＝0.000;EI:(24.80±3.58) dB vs.(19.26±5.65) dB,t＝6.107,P＝0.000]analyzed by using autotracking contrast quantification (ACQ) software.Conclusions DCUS with quantitative analysis could be considered as a new method to predict liver metastasis in patients with gastric cancer.

Pilot Study of Double Contrast Ultrasonography for Pathological Typing of Advanced Gastric Cancer

Pilot study of double contrast ultrasonography for differentiation degree of gastric cancer

A pilot study on Lauren classification of advanced gastric carcinoma using double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography

Value of Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in the Preoperative TN Staging for Gastric Cancer

Comparison of Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography and Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Preoperative Tstaging of Gastric Carcinoma

Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Evaluation of Preoperative Lauren Classification of Advanced Gastric Carcinoma

Preliminary clinical use of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis and preoperative staging of gastric cancer

Application of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography to access the lymph nodes metastasis of gastric carcinoma

The value of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in Borrmann classification of advanced gastric carcinoma

Predicting Lymph Node Status In Patients With Early Gastric Carcinoma Using Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography

Clinical Value of Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Gastric Stromal Tumors

Evaluation of the Chemotherapy Effect in Advanced Gastric Carcinoma Using Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography

Comparative Study of Double Contrast Ultrasonography with Enhanced Computed Tomography in Normal Gastric Wall

[Comparison of Preoperative T Staging by Oral Contrast Enhanced Ultrasonography and Double Contrast Enhanced Ultrasonography in Advanced Gastric Carcinoma].

The value of double contrast-enhanced unltrasonography in macroscopic classification of rectal carcinoma

Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Preoperative Borrmann Classification of Advanced Gastric Carcinoma: Comparison with Histopathology

Evaluation of the T-restaging and Effect after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Gastric Carcinoma Using Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography

Preliminary application of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography to assess the peripancreatic vascular invasion of pancreatic carcinoma

The relationship between enhanced intensity and microvessel density of gastric carcinoma using double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

Preoperative T Staging of Advanced Gastric Cancer Using Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.

Assessment of Liver Metastasis in Patients with GastricCancer Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Quantitative Analysis