Risk-adapted Therapy for Advanced-Stage Natural Killer/t-Cell Lymphoma: an Analysis from the China Lymphoma Collaborative Group Study.

Weiping Liu,Yong Yang,Shunan Qi,Ying Wang,Xia He,Gang Wu,Baolin Qu,Liting Qian,Fuquan Zhang,Xueying Qiao,Wang Hua,Gaofeng Li,Yu-Jing Zhang,Yuan Zhu,Jianzhong Cao,Junxin Wu,Tao Wu,Jun Zhu,Ye-Xiong Li,Yuqin Song
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e20041
IF: 45.3
2020-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:e20041 Background: Few studies focused on the risk-adapted therapy for advanced-stage natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (NKTCL) due to poor prognosis. Methods: Data of 406 patients with advanced-stage NKTCL from 20 Chinese institutions between 2000 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. To develop a prognosis index model for advanced-stage NKTCL, all patients were divided into the primary cohort from South China (n = 198) and the validation cohort from North China (n = 208). Clinical factors related to survival in the primary cohort were identified to construct a new prognosis index model. An external validation for the prognosis index model was performed in the validation cohort. Stratified by the prognosis index model, survival benefit for treatment models was assessed. Results: The median age was 42 years with the ratio of male/female of 2.5:1. Extra-nodal involvement was observed in 72.4% of patients. More than one third of patients received asparaginase (Asp)–containing chemotherapy. In addition, radiotherapy was administrated in 135 (33.3%) patients. The overall response rate (ORR) and complete remission (CR) rate were 59.3% and 38.3% in 337 available patients. The expected 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 26.9% and 37.3%, respectively. Based on 3 clinical variables including ECOG-PS > 1, elevated LDH and solid organs involvement, a new prognosis index model (ASPRIN) was developed and showed superior discrimination than current models including IPI, KPI and PINK in this particular population. The expected 3-year OS rates in the primary and validation cohort were 54.8% and 52.9% in the low risk group (with 0-1 risk factor), 34.4% and 38.0% in the intermediate risk group (with 2 risk factors), 13.8% and 10.6% in the high risk group (with 3-4 risk factors), respectively. Stratified by ASPRIN model, combined radio-chemotherapy provided better survival benefit than chemotherapy alone regardless of chemotherapy regimens in the low risk group (3-year PFS 52.6% vs. 22.6%, P < 0.001; 3-year OS 72.8% vs. 35.8%, P < 0.001), while Asp–containing chemotherapy improved survival with an increase of about 10%-15% in PFS and OS compared with non–Asp–containing chemotherapy in the intermediate and high risk groups. Conclusions: The outcome of advanced-stage NKTCL is still poor and heterogeneous even in the era of Asp–containing chemotherapy, which highlighted the need of establishing more effective risk-adapted therapeutic strategies.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?