Abstract:OBJECTIVE:An assessment of the transcranial approach (TCA) and the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for craniopharyngiomas (CPs) according to tumor types has not been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate both surgical approaches for different types of CPs. METHODS:A retrospective review of primary resected CPs was performed. A QST classification system based on tumor origin was used to classify tumors into 3 types as follows: infrasellar/subdiaphragmatic CPs (Q-CPs), subarachnoidal CPs (S-CPs), and pars tuberalis CPs (T-CPs). Within each tumor type, patients were further arranged into two groups: those treated via the TCA and those treated via the EEA. Patient and tumor characteristics, surgical outcomes, and postoperative complications were obtained. All variables were statistically analyzed between surgical groups for each tumor type. RESULTS:A total of 315 patients were included in this series, of whom 87 were identified with Q-CPs (49 treated via TCA and 38 via EEA); 56 with S-CPs (36 treated via TCA and 20 via EEA); and 172 with T-CPs (105 treated via TCA and 67 via EEA). Patient and tumor characteristics were equivalent between both surgical groups in each tumor type. The overall gross-total resection rate (90.5% TCA vs 91.2% EEA, p = 0.85) and recurrence rate (8.9% TCA vs 6.4% EEA, p = 0.35) were similar between surgical groups. The EEA group had a greater chance of visual improvement (61.6% vs 35.8%, p = 0.01) and a decreased risk of visual deterioration (1.6% vs 11.0%, p < 0.001). Of the patients with T-CPs, postoperative hypothalamic status was better in the TCA group than in the EEA group (p = 0.016). Postoperative CSF leaks and nasal complication rates occurred more frequently in the EEA group (12.0% vs 0.5%, and 9.6% vs 0.5%; both p < 0.001). For Q-CPs, EEA was associated with an increased gross-total resection rate (97.4% vs 85.7%, p = 0.017), decreased recurrence rate (2.6% vs 12.2%, p = 0.001), and lower new hypopituitarism rate (28.9% vs 57.1%, p = 0.008). The recurrence-free survival in patients with Q-CPs was also significantly different between surgical groups (log-rank test, p = 0.037). The EEA required longer surgical time for T-CPs (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS:CPs could be effectively treated by radical surgery with favorable results. Both TCA and EEA have their advantages and limitations when used to manage different types of tumors. Individualized surgical strategies based on tumor growth patterns are mandatory to achieve optimal outcomes.

Surgical Experiences of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Resection of Craniopharyngiomas

Endoscopic endonasal approach for management of craniopharyngiomas (65 cases)

Endoscope-Assisted Supraorbital Keyhole Approach for the Resection of Benign Tumors of the Sellar Region

[Experience in the Diagnosis and Treatment of the Postoperative Complications of Craniopharyngiomas Through Expanded Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Approach].

Endoscopic endonasal surgery for suprasellar craniopharyngiomas

Endoscopic Extrapseudocapsular Resection of Pituitary Adenoma Using Bilateral Endonasal Approach

Effect of resection and surgical experience on survival in patients with craniopharyngiomas: endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery in series of 31 cases

Extended Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Recurrent or Residual Symptomatic Craniopharyngiomas.

Clinical Outcomes of Transcranial and Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Craniopharyngiomas: A Single-Institution Experience

Endoscopic Endonasal Versus Transcranial Surgery for Primary Resection of Craniopharyngiomas Based on a New QST Classification System: a Comparative Series of 315 Patients.

Comparative analysis between extend endoscopic endonasal and open transcranial resection for craniopharyngiomas

Efficacy of the Craniopharyngioma Resection via Expanded Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Approach in the Treatment of Complex Craniopharyngioma and Its Effect on Pituitary Function and Complications of Patients

Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Resection of a Recurrent Craniopharyngioma: Techniques to Maximize Surgical Exposure and Extent of Resection

Approach selection and outcomes of craniopharyngioma resection: a single-institute study

Fully endoscopic neurosurgery using a two-handed technique for cerebellopontine angle tumors via the retrosigmoid approach

Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Skull Base Lesions:Report of 112 Cases

Analysis of curative effect of microsurgery on craniopharyngiomas (report of 126 cases)

Resection of Sellar Region Tumors Through Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Approach

[Clinical Analysis of Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Removal of Sellar Tumors].

Endoscopic Endonasal Pituitary Adenomas Surgery: the Surgical Experience of 178 Consecutive Patients and Learning Curve of Two Neurosurgeons

Microsurgical treatment and analysis of postoperative complications for craniopharyngiomas