Abstract:Introduction: This study was designed to compare the outcomes of standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (STD-CPR) and combined chest compression and abdominal compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CO-CPR) with a new device following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Moreover, we investigated whether patient prognosis improved with this combination treatment. Methods: This trial was a single-centre, prospective, randomized trial, and a blinded assessment of the outcomes was performed. A total of 297 consecutive patients with OHCA were initially screened, and 278 were randomized to the STD-CPR group (n = 135) or the CO-CPR group (n = 143). We compared the proportions of patients who achieved a return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survived to hospital admission and survived to hospital discharge. In addition, we also performed the Kaplan-Meier analysis with a log-rank test at the end of the follow-up period to compare the survival curves of the two groups. Results: The differences were not statistically significant in the proportion of patients who achieved ROSC [31/135 (23.0%) versus 35/143 (24.5%)] and survived to hospital admission [28/135 (20.7%) versus 33/143 (23.1%)] between the CO-CPR group and STD-CPR group. However, there was a significant difference in the proportion of patients who survived to hospital discharge [16/135 (11.9%) versus 7/143 (4.9%)] between the two groups. Nine patients (6.7%) in the CO-CPR group and 2 patients (1.4%) in the STD group showed good neurological outcomes according to the cerebral performance category (CPC) scale score, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.003). The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the patients in the CO-CPR group achieved better survival benefits than those in the STD-CPR group at the end of the follow-up period (log-rank P = 0.007). Conclusion: CO-CPR was more beneficial than STD-CPR in terms of survival benefits in patients who have suffered out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, registered number: ChiCTR2100049581 . Registered 30 July 2021- Retrospectively registered. http://www.medresman.org.cn/uc/index.aspx .

The Progression in the Technology and Mechanism of External Chest Compression

The Discussion of Several Problems about Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Cardiac Arrest

Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest.

High-Quality Chest Compression for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Using Newly-Designed Automatic Device

The optimal chest compression point on sternum based on chest-computed tomography: A retrospective study

A New Method of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Executed by Rhythmic Abdominal Lifting and Compression

A review of compression, ventilation, defibrillation, drug treatment, and targeted temperature management in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Comparison of manual chest compression versus mechanical chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Research Progress and Prospect of Direct Cardiac Compression Devices

Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Is Better Than Manual CPR? Literature Study

Mechanical Versus Manual Chest Compression: A Retrospective-Cohort in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of the Thumper Device for Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

Safety of mechanical and manual chest compressions in cardiac arrest patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mechanical chest compression with a medical parallel manipulator for cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Comparison of the effects of using feedback devices for training or simulated cardiopulmonary arrest

Review of Portable Basic Life Support Equipment

Application of Technology in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, a Narrative Review

Iatrogenic Injuries in Manual and Mechanical Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Evaluation of abdominal compression-decompression combined with chest compression CPR performed by a new device: Is the prognosis improved after this combination CPR technique?

Testing mechanical chest compression devices for pre-hospital patient transport under resuscitation

Alternative techniques for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in extreme environments - A scoping review