Non-optic nerve transecting evisceration combined with first stage hydroxyapatite orbital implantation

Yah-long BI,Xiang-song HU,Qi ZHOU,Song-yi WU,Shi-fang YU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0290.2012.01.009
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To observe the clinical effects of a new method:non-optic nerve transecring evisceration combined with first stage hydroxyapatite orbital implantation.Methods One hundred and twenty two eyes (122 cases) were randomly divided into group A and group B,evisceration was first undertaken,the scleral wall was superior-temporally to inferior-nasally dissected and double scleral petals were placed before the implanted hydroxyapatite artificial eyeball.The difference between group A and group B was:in group A,the optic nerve was transected behind the eyeball,but in group B,a 2 mm outside the optic nerve scleral circle cutting was taken.Hemostasis time before implantation,tensile force during conjunctival suture,pain during surgery,palpebral fissure height after eye speculum wearing,operation time consuming,pain after surgery,conjunctival edema and congestion,and ocular prosthesis wearing time were compared between the two groups.Results In groups A and B,the intra-operative hemostasis time were (23.46 ± 6.96)mins and (5.49 ± 1.72)mins,the tensile force score during conjunctiva suture were 3.39±0.74 and 0.45±0.59,the score of pain in the first day were 2.8 ±0.68 and 1.47 ± 0.67,the ocular prosthesis wearing time after surgery were (6.27±2.73) and (3.07 ± 2.11)weeks,respectively.The differences of all the parameters above were with statistical significance between groups A and B (P<0.01).During 2 years follow-up,no complications such as orbital implant exposure or infection happened.Conclusions Compared to traditional methods,the non-optic nerve transecting evisceration method has merits of less impairment,short time-consuming,less pain,and quicker postoperative recovery.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?