Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To develop and evaluate scaling and scoring assumptions, and the reliability and the validity of a Chinese version of the SF-36 scales.METHODS:A multi-stage mixed sampling procedure was used to select a representative sample of the general population. The sample size was 1 000 households. All family members of a selected household, aged 18 and older, completed a survey by self-administration. Formal psychometric methods for testing assumptions underlying item scoring and scale construction were used according to the standard procedure of the IQOLA Project.RESULTS:Of the 1 985 collected questionnaires, 1 972 were qualified. Of them, 1 688 (85.6%) were respondents. 1 316 respondents answered all 36 items, while the remaining (372 respondents) answered with one or several missing responses. Among the non-respondents, 65.5% were illiteracy or quasi-illiteracy. The assumption of equal intervals was violated for the VT and MH scales. The recoded item values were used to calculate scale scores. The clustering and ordering of the item means were approximately the same as that of the source version and other two Chinese versions. The items in each scale had similar standard deviations except those in the PF, BP, SF scales. The correlations between an item and its hypothesized scale were identical for all except the SF and VT scales. The scaling success rates of convergent validity were 0% for the SF scale, 75% for the VT scale, and 100% for the other six scales. The scaling success rates of discriminat validity ranged from 87.5% to 100% for all scales except for the SF scale. The Cronbach' alpha coefficients of internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.72 to 0.88, which were satisfactory for group comparison except 0.39 for the SF scale and 0.66 for the VT scale. The two-weeks test-retest reliability coefficient ranged from 0.66 to 0.94. Factor analysis identified two principal components: a "physical" factor and a "mental" factor. Taken together, these two factors could be used to explain 56.3% of the total variance.CONCLUSION:The Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scale has achieved conceptual equivalence and satisfied the psychometric scaling assumptions well enough to warrant wide use in China. Known-groups validity will give more meaningful evidences of the validity of the Chinese SF-36 scales.

Translation and Reliability, Validity Testing of JSE-HP ( Nursing Student Edition)

Translation, Revision and Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale

Reliability and validity of Chinese version of Barriers to Enteral Feeding Critically Ill Patients Questionnaire

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Student Evidence-based Practice Questionnaire

Translation and validation of the traditional Chinese NLN educational practices questionnaire, simulation design scale and student satisfaction and self-confidence in learning

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the Self-awareness Scale for Nurses

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Student Nurse Stress Index Scale ( SNSI-CHI)

Preliminary test of the reliability and validity of Chinese version of the Nurse Spiritual Therapeutics Scale/

Valuation of the cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the chinese version of the hidden curriculum evaluation scale in nursing education

Translation and psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the metacognitive awareness scale among nursing students

The Chinese Version of Instrument of Professional Attitude for Student Nurses (IPASN): Assessment of Reliability and Validity.

Reliability and validity test of the Chinese version of the spiritual care-giving scale in nursing undergraduates and its application

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese Version of the Attitudes, Subjective Norms, Perceived Behavioural Control and Intention to Pursue a Career in Mental Health Nursing Scale

The Reliability and Validity of Chinese Translation of RSQ-SSV in Undergraduate Student

Validation of a Chinese version of the Analysing and Developing Adaptability and Performance in Teams to Enhance Resilience Scale in nurses in China

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Nurses' Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale

The Chinese Version of Attitudes Towards Guidelines Scale: Validity and Reliability Assessment

Chinese version of the nursing students' perception of instructor caring (C-NSPIC): assessment of reliability and validity

Development and Cross-National Validation of a French Version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy for Students

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Nursing Student Contributions to Clinical Settings scale and analysis of factors influencing nurses' perceptions of nursing students' contributions: a cross-sectional study