Comparison on Effects of Vaginal Repair and Hysteroscopic and Laparoscopic Repair on Uterine Incision Diverticulum after Cesarean Section

Jun Hou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-4756.2019.07.011
2019-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate and compare the clinical efficacy of vaginal repair and hysteroscopic and laparoscopic repair for uterine incision diverticulum after cesarean section. Methods Forty-six patients with uterine incision diverticulum after cesarean section admitted to Peking University Shenzhen Hospital from July 2016 to May 2017 were selected as study subjects. According to the random number table method, patients were divided into control group and observation group, with 23 cases in each group. Patients in control group were treated by vaginal repair, while patients in observation group were treated by hysteroscopic and laparoscopic repair. The operation and clinical effects of the two groups were observed. Results In observation group, the operation time was ( 63. 61 ± 1. 35) min, intraoperative blood loss was (84. 31 ± 9. 52) ml, vaginal bleeding time was (6. 31 ± 1. 24) d, and hospital stay was (3. 78 ± 1. 26) d, all of which were lower than those in control group, (79. 12 ± 1. 50) min, (84. 31 ±9. 52) ml, (6. 31 ±1. 24) d, (3. 78 ±1. 26) d; and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0. 05). After treatment, the diverticulum depth was (2. 52 ± 0. 33) mm, diverticulum width was (5. 04 ± 0. 21) mm and menstrual time was (5. 95 ± 1. 09) d in observation group, which was (4. 43 ±0. 95) mm, (7. 80 ±0. 10) mm, (7. 47 ±1. 11) d, respectively, in control group; and these indexes of observation group were significantly lower than those of control group (P <0. 05). Conclusions Hysteroscopic and laparoscopic repair has a good therapeutic effect on uterine incision diverticulum after cesarean section, so it can be promoted and applied in clinical.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?