Abstract:Objective To explore the clinical choice principles of sedated upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy versus conventional upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy.Methods Sedated GI endoscopy group (n =400) and conventional GI endoscopy group (n =400) were respectively set up with patients who had undergone the two procedures from May 13 to July 29,2013.All patients and endoscopists were asked to fill out a self-administered questionnaire about procedure-related discomfort,patient satisfaction and endoscopist satisfaction with endoscopy,and the endoscopic image score.Patients were also asked about whether they would opt for the identical upper GI endoscopy again in the future if required.The endoscopy completion,operation time,and questionnaire results of the two groups were compared and statistically analyzed.Results The completion rates were 100.0％ (400/400) and 98.0％ (392/400) in the sedated GI endoscopy group and the conventional GI endoscopy group,respectively (P =0.004).The operation times of sedated and conventional group were (257.7 ± 133.5) s and (214.2 ± 121.3) s respectively (P ＜ 0.001).And the mean cost was CNY 574.23 and CNY 268.00 per patient in sedated and the conventional group,respectively.Patient satisfaction scores of conventional group and sedated group were 3 (2 ～ 3) and 4 (3 ～4) respectively (Z=-18.98,P ＜0.001),while endoscopist satisfaction was both 4(4 ～4) in two groups (Z=-2.645,P =0.008).The endoscopic image scores were (3.13 ±0.39) points and (3.18 ± 0.50) points for sedated and conventional group (P =0.153),respectively.SpO2 of 20 patients (5.0％) in the sedated group decreased during the procedure.Binary logistic regression analysis predicted correlated factors for a decreased SpO2 in the SES of identified cardiovascular disorders (P =0.004,OR =2.410,95％ CI:0.924 ～6.287) and older age (P =0.002,OR =1.039,95 ％ CI:1.002 ～ 1.077).A total of 381 patients (95.2％) in the sedated group and 145 patients (36.4％) in the conventional group showed willingness to accept the identical upper GI endoscopy again (P ＜0.001).Males (P =0.007) aged above 60 (P =0.031) and BMI≤24 kg/m2(P =0.039) in the conventional group were more willing to repeat conventional GI endoscopy.Conclusion Conventional GI endoscopy remains an indispensable examination of upper gastrointestinal disease in China due to its high completion rates,shorter procedure time and lower cost.Physicians should not only focus on patients' comfort during endoscopy,but also help patients make a balanced decision based on their actual situation and endoscopic indications.

The prospective randomized controlled study about tolerability of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy

Evaluation of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy:a controlled trial

Comparison of the Cardiovascular Impacts of Transnasal Versus Transoral Gastroscopy in the Aged Patients with or Without Hypertension.

A prospective randomized trial of transnasal ileus tube vs nasogastric tube for adhesive small bowel obstruction.

Acceptability, Safety, and Feasibility of Transnasal and Peroral Ultrathin Endoscopy Using GAGLESS Mouthpieces: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Evaluation of topical pharyngeal anesthesia in gastroscopy and factors related to the tolerance of patient: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study

Sedated versus conventional upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective study on patient acceptability and satisfaction

Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation of acupuncture points improves tolerance in adults undergoing diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a single-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial

Efficacy of transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange on painless gastroscopy in obese patients

Sedated versus conventional colonoscopy:a prospective study on patient acceptability and satisfaction

Acceptability to patients of screening disposable transnasal endoscopy: qualitative interview analysis

The Clinical Efficacy of Painless Gastroscopy in Civil Aviation General Hospital

Real-word Evaluation of Differences in Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy Between the Digestive and the Non-Digestive Physicians: A Retrospective Study

A Randomised Clinical Trial of Transnasal Endoscopy Versus Fluoroscopy for the Placement of Nasojejunal Feeding Tubes in Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis

Associations of Anxiety with Discomfort and Tolerance in Chinese Patients Undergoing Esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

[Electronic Laryngoscope for Transnasal Esophageal Examination].

Study on Simultaneous Application of Painless Gastroscopy and Enteroscopy

A comparison between the Disposcope endoscope and fibreoptic bronchoscope for nasotracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial

Evaluation of pharyngeal lidocaine anesthesia for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: Double-blind randomized control trial

A comparison between the Disposcope endoscope and fiberoptic bronchoscope for nasotracheal intubation-A randomized controlled trial

Examination tolerance, pre-examination anxiety, knowledge needs and cooperation in gastroscopic examinees: A prospective, correlational analysis in a health screening population