Abstract:Objective The widely use of ultrasound elastography has increased the detection rate of breast cancer.It has great advantage of differential diagnosis of breast tumor.Our study is to evaluate and compare the value of the quantitative ultrasound elastography parameters of AR ( area ratio) , ESR ( entire strain ratio) , LSR ( locolized strain ratio) , EFLR( entire fat to lesion ratio) and LFLR( locolized fat to lesion ratio) in the differential diagnosis of breast tumor. Methods 110 patients with 113 breast tumors were collected from Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Region between January 2015 and January 2016 who underwent breast exami-nation.The tumors were divided into two groups according to patholo-gy which acts as gold standard:benign group with 59 lesions and ma-lignant group with 54 lesions.Participants underwent quantitative ul-trasound elastography parameters examination.AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR、LFLR were compared between benign group and malignant group and ROC curve was drawn.Conventional ultrasound and ultrasound elastography parameter are combined to differentiate the benign or malignant lesion.Calculate the various parameters on the accuracy、susceptibility、specificity、positive likelihood ratio、negative likeli-hood ratio of the diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions, and determine the quantitative parameter with the highest accuracy. Results The mean value of AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR of malignant lesions were all significantly greater than that of benign le-sions (P=0.000).Compared with the conventional ultrasound, AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR have higher AUC in the differentia-tion of benign and malignant breast lesions;AUC of AR and ESR are higher than conventional ultrasound、LSR、EFLR and LFLR( P<0.000).Compared with conventional ultrasound(1.523) alone, conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR、ESR、EFLR and LFLR have higher positive likelihood ratio(11.581、8.272、3.482、2.458、2.100) in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity(P<0.000).The AUC of conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR and ESR[0.940(0.890~0.990)、0.941(0.891~0.990)] were higher than conventional ultrasound and conventional ultrasound com-bined separately with LSR、EFLR、LFLR[0.669(0.669~0.768)、0.837(0.759~0.915)、0.763(0.673~0.852)、0.787(0.701~0.874)],so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity and positive likelihood ratio(P<0.000). Conclusion Quantitative ultrasound elastography may be helpful in differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, especially combining conventional ultrasound with AR and ESR, which were superior to combining with the other parameters and provide a more objective and credible basis to differenti-ate benign and malignant breast tumors with conventional ultrasound.

Preliminary Application of Quantitative Analysis of Focal Liver Lesions with Dynamic 3D Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography

[Application Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography for Assessing the High-Risk Population of Hepatic Malignant Tumor].

Deep Learning Radiomics for Focal Liver Lesions Diagnosis on Long-Range Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Clinical Factors

Feasibility of dynamic three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound in focal liver lesions: Image quality evaluation and correlation of quantification with two-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Comparison of Contrast‐enhanced Ultrasonography with Virtual Touch Tissue Quantification in the Evaluation of Focal Liver Lesions

Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound for quantitative analysis in liver neoplasms

Preliminary application of dynamic three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis of liver tumor

Shear-wave elastography combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound algorithm for noninvasive characterization of focal liver lesions

Comparison Of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound And Contrast-Enhanced Helical Ct In The Diagnosis Of High Echo-Level Small Focal Liver Lesions

Quantitative Analysis of the Time–Intensity Curve of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of the Liver: Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Liver Lesions

Contribution of semiquantitative analysis with dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions

Characterization of Focal Liver Lesions Indistinctive on B Mode Ultrasound: Benefits of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

Clinical Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in the Characterization of Focal Liver Lesions: a Prospective Multicenter Trial.

Quantitative Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Renal Lesions: a Preliminary Study

Usefulness of the Contrast‐Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System in Diagnosing Focal Liver Lesions by Inexperienced Radiologists

The added value of color parameter imaging for the evaluation of focal liver lesions with "homogenous hyperenhancement and no wash out" on contrast enhanced ultrasound

Comparison of Enhancement Features of Hepatic Tumors Between Dynamic Three-Dimensional and Two-Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography

Focal Liver Lesions: Real-time 3-Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Compared With 2-Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Detection and Characterization of Small Superficially Located Focal Liver Lesions by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound with High Frequency Transducers.

Evaluation of Breast Lesions by Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis.

The differentiation of malignant and benign lesions of the breast by quantitative Ultrasound elastography