Expression and Clinical Significance of Absent in Melanoma 2 in Pancreatic Cancer

Wu Shaoxian,Li Yuan,Zheng Panpan,Xiao Wenlu,Sun Runzi,Liu Juan,Chen Lujun,Lu Binfeng,Jiang Jingting
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9030.2019.09.041
2019-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the expression of absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2) in pancreatic cancer tissues and its correlation with patients' clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis.Methods The tissue microarray and immunohistochemistry were used to examine the AIM2 expression in 94 cases of pancreatic cancer tissues and 71 cases of adjacent normal tissues.Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare the expression of AIM2 in pancreatic cancer and corresponding adjacent normal tissues.The chi-square test was used to analyze the relationship between the AIM2 expression in pancreatic cancer tissues and clinicopathological features of the patients.Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to analyze the correlation between AIM2 expression and patients' overall survival,and the Cox model was used to analyze the correlation between different clinical parameters and prognosis.Results The immunohistochemistry results showed that AIM2 was highly expressed in adjacent normal tissues (226.18 ±59.41),with no or low expression in pancreatic cancer tissues (195.37 ±63.08),and the difference between cancer tissues and adjacent normal tissues was statistically significant (P < 0.01).The high expression rate of AIM2 in male patients (58.6%) was lower than that in female patients (80.6%,x2 =4.835,P <0.05).The high expression rate of AIM2 in patients with T1-T2 (73.0%) was higher than that in patients with T3 (45.0%,x2 =5.574,P < 0.05).The proportion of AIM2 high expression in patients with distant metastasis was higher than that in patients without distant metastasis (P < 0.05).The intensity of AIM2 staining was not significantly correlated with other clinicopathological features (P > 0.05).Kaplan-Merier survival analysis showed that the overall survival (OS) of patients with low expression of AIM2 was significantly shorter than that of patients with high AIM2 expression [hazard ratio (HR) =1.810,95% confidence interval (CI):1.096-2.988,P < 0.05].Multi-factor Cox model analysis indicated that pathological grade (HR =0.575,95% CI:0.342-0.964,P < 0.05) and AIM2 high expression (HR =1.902,95% CI:1.084-3.338,P <0.05) were independent prognostic factors of pancreatic cancer patients.Conclusion AIM2 is expressed lowly in pancreatic cancer and can be used as a major factor in the prognosis evaluation of pancreatic cancer patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?