Abstract:Aim This study aimed to evaluate examinees' perceptions of the performance of student standardized patients (SPs) and to explore student SPs' experiences. Background Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is a standard approach to the task of evaluating students' clinical competency that relies on SPs. However, professional SPs are characterized by high costs and insufficient availability. Training students to serve as SPs can help address this lack of OSCE resources. However, only preliminary evidence regarding this process and its feasibility has been reported. Design We used a concurrent mixed-method study design that included quantitative surveys and qualitative group interviews. Methods Our sample consisted of two-year Bachelor of Nursing program students and trained student SPs who were recruited in May 2021. We used a 5-item performance evaluation tool to assess the SPs' performance. The reliability of this evaluation tool was indicated by a Cronbach's α coefficient of.95. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the examinees' satisfaction with the student SPs' performance using SPSS 28.0 software. We used a semi-structured interview guide during a group interview; the interview was transcribed verbatim and analyzed via thematic analysis with the assistance of Microsoft Word software. Results Eighty-two nursing school students responded to the survey and 10 student SPs were included in a group interview. Nursing school students rated SPs' performance favorably. The mean score assigned to the SPs on the performance scale was 4.41 out of 5. The student SPs described the challenges and benefits that they experienced regarding their role. The challenges they described included 1) staying true to my role, 2) overcoming a physically overwhelming role and 3) facing the threat of insecurity. However, the corresponding benefits included 1) gaining rewards, 2) advancing nursing competency and 3) experiencing a sense of accomplishment. Conclusion After undergoing training, the SPs performed well. They experienced a variety of challenges and obtained certain benefits. In health care education, recruiting students to serve as SPs is feasible.

Training and Thinking of Student Standardized Patients

Standardized patient training in gynecology and obstetrics

Exploration and Thinking on the Training of Surgical Standardized Patient

Training and thoughts of student standardized patients for mental disorder

Application of students standardized patient in teaching and assessment of physical examination skills

Applying standardized patients to augment clinical skills in clinical medical students’ national proficiency test

Training for 8-Year Medical Students As Urological Standardized Patients

Exploration of Standardized Patients in the Assessment of Doctor-Patient Communication on 8-Year Program Medical Students

Establishing of Modified Standardized Patients and Their Application in Surgical Clinical Case Discussions

Application of standardized patient in urologic teaching

Study on the Application of Standardized Patient in Practice Courses of Diagnostics

Practice of enhancing clinical thinking training and assessment in medical students

Applying Standardized Patients to Strengthening Training of Basic Skills During Preclinical Stage

Application of Standardized Patients in Classroom Teaching of Psychiatry

The Training and Applying of Gynecological and Obstetrical Standardized Patient in Objective Structured Clinical Examination

Application of Standardized Patient in Clinical Surgical Practice Teaching for Eight-Year-program Medical Students

Training Students to Serve as Standardized Patients in an Objective Structured Clinical Examination is Feasible: A Mixed-Methods Study

Construction and Management of Standardized Patients of Surgery

Application of Student Standardized Patients Simulation in Clinical Practice Teaching of Rehabilitation Therapy

Study of the introduction of the student as standard patient in the clinical teaching of endocrinology

Application of standardized patient in mid-term assessment of urologic postgraduates