Abstract:Objective To determine whether the use of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials(CONSORT) statement is associated with the improvement in the reporting quality of RCTs published in Chinese pediatric journals.Methods Six core Chinese pediatric journals including Journal of Clinical Pediatrics,Chinese Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics,Chinese Journal of Practical Pediatrics,Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Pediatrics,Chinese Journal of Pediatrics,Chinese Journal of Pediatric Surgery,were hand-searched from inception to Dec.2010.The CONSORT checklists were used to assess reporting quality.Other important data such as reporting of ethics review and informed consent,involving research centers,clinical trials registry and sample size were extracted as well.Given CONSORT statement was firstly introduced into China in 1997,the identified studies were grouped in two publication periods,i.e.before 1996(pre-CONSORT),and 1997-2010(post-CONSORT).Data were summarized using descriptive statistics such as frequency,median and interquartile range(IQR).Results A total of 619 RCTs were identified and 157 of them were published before 1997 when CONSORT statement was firstly introduced into China.Even though the reporting quality of RCTs published in Chinese pediatric journals changed significantly in some of the aspects such as introduction,recruitment,baseline data and ancillary analyses(P<0.05) etc,some important methodological components were still incompletely reported,such as sample size calculation method(0.6% vs.1.1%),sequence generation for randomization(3.2% vs 7.6%),allocation concealment(0 vs 1.1%) or blinding(0 vs 2.6%).Moreover,none of RCTs published in Chinese pediatric journals reported the following items,such as important changes to methods after trial commencement,changes to trials outcomes after the trials commencement and presentation of both absolute and relative effect sizes for binary outcomes.Assessing 9 RCTs published in Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Pediatrics which uniquely adopted CONSORT statement in its instructions to authors,it indicated that its reporting of sample size calculating method,sequence generation,allocation concealment,blinding and implementation was higher than other journals'.Conclusions Overall,the reporting quality of RCTs has not substantially improved since the introduction of CONSORT statement in China.The quality of reporting RCTs is still generally poor and often not adequate to allow readers to assess the validity of trials.

Quality Assessment of Clinical Trials Published in the Journal of Orthodontics in the Past Ten Years

[Evidence-Based Quality Assessment of 10-Year Orthodontic Clinical Trials in 4 Major Dental Journals].

[Evidence-Based Quality Assessment of Chinese Clinical Trials on the Effects of Stabilization of Permanent Anterior Dental Trauma].

Quality Assessment on Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in China

[Quality Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trials Related to Dental Implant].

The quality assessment of the interventional radiololgy publications in Chinese journal of radiology using the randomized controlled trials

Evaluation of randomized clinical trial papers published in medical sci-tech journals depending on 2010 CONSORT statement

Quality Assessment of the Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in the Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine with the Revised CONSORT Statement

A survey of reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in the field of pediatrics published in Chinese pediatric journal

Qualities of Controlled Clinical Trials Relevant to Acupuncture and Moxibustion Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease in Literatures Published in China from 1990——2009

The quality of reporting RCT abstracts in four major orthodontics journals for the period 2012–2017

The quality of reports of randomized clinical trials on traditional Chinese medicine treatments: a systematic review of articles indexed in the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database from 2005 to 2012

Quality Problems of Clinical Trials in China: Evidence from Quality Related Studies

The Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine: a Survey of 13 Randomly Selected Journals from Mainland China.

An assessment of the study design and methodological quality of researches published in the Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

Re Response To: the 100 Top-Cited Articles in Orthodontics from 1975 to 2011 by Jifang Hui, Zongkai Han, Guannan Geng, Weijun Yan and Ping Shao. the Angle Orthodontist; on Line Early: Http://Dx.doi.org/10.2319/040512-284.1

Evaluation of the Randomized Controlled Trials Papers Published in Jiangsu Journal of TraditionalChinese Medicine from 1980 to 1998

Preliminary quality assessment of chinese clinical trials about functional appliance

Assessment of the Reporting Quality of Ophthalmic Diseases Related Randomized Controlled Trials Published in SCI Journals from Mainland China

Quality assessment of paediatric randomized controlled trials published in China from 1999 to 2022: a cross-sectional study

Quality Assessment of the Reports of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in 5 Journals of Psychiatry in China from 2004 to 2008 by Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Statement