Abstract:Objective To compare the position and magnitude of internal target gross volume ( IGTV )of primary hepatocarcinoma delineated by three methods based on four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) and to investigate the relevant factors affecting the position and magnitude.Methods Twenty patients with primary hepatocarcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) underwent big bore 4D-CT simulation scan of the thorax and abdomen using a real-time position management ( RPM )system for simultaneous record of the respiratory signals.The CT images with respiratory signal data were reconstructed and sorted into 10 phase groups in a respiratory cycle,with 0％ phase corresponding to endinhale and 50％ corresponding to end-exhale. The maximum intensity projection (MIP) image was generated.IGTVs of the tumor were delineated using the following three methods:( 1 ) The gross tumor volume (GTV) on each of the ten respiratory phases of the 4D-CT image set was delineated and fused ten GTV to produce IGTV10; (2) The GrTNs delineated separately based on 0％ and 50％ phase were fused to produce IGTVIN+EX ; (3) The visible tumor on the MIP image was delineated to produce IGTVMIP.Twenty patients were divided into groups A and B based on the location of the target center,and were divided into groups C and D based on the tumor maximum diameter.The patients were divided into groups E and F based on the three-dimensional (3D) motion vector of the target center.The position of the target center,the volume of target,the degree of inclusion (DI) and the matching index (MI) were compared reciprocally between IGTV10,IGTVIN + EX and IGTV MIP,and the influence of the tumor position and 3D motion vector on the related parameters were compared based on the grouping.Results The average differences between the position of the center of IGTVs on direction of X,Y and Z axes were less than 1.5 nun,and the difference was statistically not significant.The volume of IGTV10 was larger than that of IGTVIN+EX,but the difference was not significant (t =0.354,P =0.725 ).The volume of IGTV10 was larger than that of IGTVMIP,but the difference was not significant (t =-0.392,P =0.697).The ratio of IGTVIN+EX to IGTV10 was 0.75 ±0.15 and the ratio of IGTVMIP to IGTV10 was 0.78 ±0.14.The DI of IGTVIN+Ex in IGTV10 was (74.85 ±15.09 ) ％ and that of IGTVMIP in IGTV10 was (68.87 ± 13.69) ％.The MI between IGTV10 and IGTVIN +EX,IGTV10 and IGTVMIP were 0.75 ±0.15 and 0.67 ±0.13,respectively.The median of ratio of IGTVIN+EX/IGTV10 was 0.57 in group A versus 0.87 in group B,statistically with a significant difference between the groups A and B ( Z =- 3.300,P =0.001 ).The median of ratio of IGTVMIp/IGTV10 was 0.51 in the group A and 0.72 in group B,with a significant difference between the groups A and B (Z =-3.413,P =0.001 ).The median of ratio of IGTVIN +EX/IGTV10 was 0.79 in group C versus 0.74 in group D,with a difference not significant (Z =-0.920,P =0.358).The median of ratio of IGTVMIP/IGTV10 was 0.85 in group C versus 0.80 in group D,with a non-significant difference (Z =- 0.568,P =0.570).The median of ratio of IGTVIN+EX/IGTV10 was 0.87 in group E versus 0.68 in group F,with a significant difference between the two groups ( Z =- 2.897,P =0.004 ).The median of ratio of IGTVMIP/IGTV10 was 0.85 in the group E versus 0.81 in the group F,with a non-significant difference ( Z =- 0.568,P =0.570).Conclusions The center displacement of the IGTVs delineated separately by the three techniques based on 4D-CT images is not obvious.IGTVIN+Ex and IGTVMIP can not replace IGTV10,however,IGTVIN+EX is more close to IGTV10 comparing with IGTVMIP.The ratio of IGTV10 and IGTVMIP is correlated to the 3D motion vector of the tumor.When the tumor is situated in the upper part of the liver and with a 3D motion vector less than 9 mm,IGTV10 should be the best IGTV.

Comparison between IGTVs based on ten phases of 4DCT and nine PET-CT SUV thresholds in primary thoracic esophageal cancer

Comparison of primary target volumes delineated on four-dimensional CT and 18 F-FDG PET/CT of non-small-cell lung cancer

Comparison of 4D-CT and PET-CT Based Internal Gross Tumor Volumes Delineation for Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer

A comparative study of planning target volumes based on three-dimensional computed tomography, four-dimensional computed tomography, and positron emission tomography-computed tomography in thoracic esophageal cancer

Comparison of internal gross tumor volumes delineated based on MIP images of 4DCT and different SUN thresholds of FDG PET/CT for non-small cell lung cancer

Comparison of three methods to delineate internal gross target volume of the primary hepatocarcinoma based on four-dimensional CT simulation images

A comparison of gross tumor volume among three-dimensional, four-dimensional and cone beam computed tomography in primary esophageal cancer

Variations of spatial position and overlap ratio for GTV50 and IGTV of primary thoracic esophageal cancer during radiotherapy:a study based on 4DCT scans

Comparison of gross target volumes based on four-dimensional CT, positron emission tomography-computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in thoracic esophageal cancer

A comparative study of four-and three-dimensional computed tomography simulation in determining displacement and volume for target region of primary tumor in esophageal carcinoma

Comparison of 4D-CT and 3D-CT simulation in determining displacement and target volume of primary esophageal carcinoma

Impact of contrast-enhanced 4DCT scan on delineating GTV and constructing IGTV in thoracic esophageal cancer

Comparison of the Gross Target Volumes Based on Diagnostic PET/CT for Primary Esophageal Cancer

Comparison Of Gross Tumor Volume Of Primary Oesophageal Cancer Based On Contrast-Enhanced Three-Dimensional, Four-Dimensional, And Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Comparison of internal gross tumor volume for peripheral lung cancer based on four dimensional CT or three dimensional CT assisted with active breathing control

Comparison of PTV Based on FDG PET-CT Versus 4DCT in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Geometrical Evaluation of 3Dct-Based and Pet/4dct-Based Target Volumes in the Definition of Radiation Treatment Planning in Primary Thoracic Esophageal Cancer

Comparison of the gross target volume based on diagnostic PET/CT for primary esophageal cancer

Comparison Of Primary Tumour Volumes Delineated On Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography Maximum Intensity Projection And F-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography Images Of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

A comparative study of target volumes based on 18 F-FDG PET-CT and ten phases of 4DCT for primary thoracic squamous esophageal cancer.

Comparison of gross target volumes based on four-dimensional CT, positron emission tomography-computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in thoracic esophageal cancer