Effects of Work-Rest Schedules on Accommodation,vergence for Computer Terminal Reader

WANG Bo-min,YU Min-bin,LI Jing-rong,LIN Xian-chai,XIANG Hui

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-4443.2010.04.013

2010-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effects of work-rest schedules on accommodation,vergence for computer terminal reader.Methods Thirty participants underwent 5 reading assignments: (1) 2-hour continuous computer-hased reading,followed by 10 minutes rest; (2) 2-hour continuous book-based reading,followed by 10 minutes rest; (3) 1 hour continuous computer-based reading followed by 10 minutes rest (work-rest schedule 1,WS1); (4) 1-hour computer-based reading with a 5-min break in every 30 mins (WS2); (5) 1-hour computer-based reading with a 2-min break in every 15 mins (WS3).On the same day before and after assignment,non-Cycioplegic refraction,lag of accommodation (LA),accommodation amplitude (AA),and vergence (including near point of convergence [NPC],horizontal phoria [HP] at near [HP-N]and far [HP-F] distance,and horizontal fusionai vergence [HFV] at near and far distance,accommodative convergence/accommodation[AC/A]) were measured.Results People with reading assignment 1 were more likely to have increased LA,NPC,horizontal exophoria at near distance (HP-N exo),and decreased AA,horizontal esophoria at near distance (HP-N eso),horizonta fusional convergence at near distance (HFC-N) than did people with reading assignment 2 (P＜0.05).These changes but HP and HFC-N were more profound in people with assignment 1 than in people with assignment 3 (WS1) (all with P＜0.05).These changes but HFCN were seen in people with WS1/WS2 than in people with WS3 (all with P＜0.05).Conclusions Computer-based reading is more likely to affect accommodation and vergence than book-based reading.The impacts increase with longer reading time.Compared with WS1 and WS2,WS3 is the optimal reading schedule with least impact on accommodation and vergence.