Problems in treatment of distal femoral fracture with locking plate

王秋根,高堪达,李凡,黄建华,高伟,陶杰,李豪青,吴晓明,吴小峰,周孜辉,王建东,汪方,李晓苏,陶忠亮
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2011.03.002
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective To discuss problems in the treatment of distal femoral fractures with locking plate. Methods Eight cases of distal femoral fractures or nonunions were selected for the present study from our database who had been treated with locking plate in our hospital between March, 2007 and June,2010. They were 6 acute fractures and 2 nonunions following original implant failure. They were 7 men and one woman, with an average age of 48.5 years (range, 37 to 63 years). According to AO classification, there were 2 cases of type 32-A1, one case of type 33-A1, one case of type 33-A3 and 4 cases of type 33-C2. All were closed fractures. Of the 6 acute fractures, 5 were treated with close reduction and less invssive stabilization system-distal femur (LISS-DF) and one with open reduction and fixation with peri-articular anatomic locking plate. The 2 nonunions were treated with LISS-DF after removal of the failed implants. Results The patients were followed up for 12 to 30 months (average, 22.1 months). The average time from injury to fracture healing was 22 months (range, 4 to 49 months). Range of movement (ROM) of the affected knee was 40° to 125° (average, 81.3°) at the last follow-up.Conclusion Complications like delayed union or nonunion are likely to occur in treatment of distal femoral fractures with locking plate, unless orthopaedic surgeons have a good understanding of the fracture site and types and a great respect for principles and indications of the locking plate fixation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?