Abstract:The thermal conductivity (λ) of soils is an important property in a variety of science and engineering applications. One of the most widely used λ models in soil science was proposed by de Vries (deV‐0). This model is complicated and difficult to use as it is based on several controversial assumptions. The deV‐0 assumes that a soil system is composed of non‐contacting solid particles (rotated uniform ellipsoids) that are dispersed in a continuous homogeneous medium (air or water). Furthermore, deV‐0 assumes that soil solids consist of quartz and consolidated bulk minerals. These assumptions do not reflect the true nature of soils that are composed of several compacted minerals, diverse in shape and notably different in size. A critical analysis of this model concluded that it's most controversial feature was inherited from an electrical conductivity model for a two‐phase dispersion system; specifically, from weighting shape factors of non‐contacting rotated oblate ellipsoids. Furthermore, deV‐0 has not yet been fully examined and verified with respect to a comprehensive and complete soil λ database. Also, there is a lack of comparable models to deV‐0 that would contain a complete set of clearly described and linked expressions. Consequently, two slightly adjusted versions of deV‐0 were developed; namely, deV‐1 with soil bulk mineralogy (quartz plus integrated residual minerals) and deV‐2 with complete soil mineralogy, i.e. including individual contribution from all soil minerals. Both models underwent successful calibration and verification against λ data of 39 Canadian Field Soils and three Standard Sands. Markedly improved estimates (λest) were obtained when, instead of dry air thermal conductivity (λa), an apparent air thermal conductivity (λa‐app = λa + λv) was applied (λv represents thermal effects caused by migration of water vapor and evaporation/condensation processes). For deV‐1, the following reduction of standard deviation (SD) data was obtained: 53.5% for 17 coarse soils, 34% for 22 fine soils, while 44.5% for all 39 soils. Then, the same calibration factors of deV‐1 were applied to deV‐2 model and similar reduction of SD data was obtained (52.7%, 24.1%, and 40.1%, respectively). Generally, for 39 Canadian Field Soils, both models (deV‐1 and deV‐2), with quartz thermal conductivity (λqtz) of 7.6 W·m‐1·K‐1, produced very close λ estimates (SD ≈ 0.099 and 0.094 W·m‐1·K‐1, respectively). Taking into account the simplicity of mineral composition and fewer calibration coefficients, deV‐1 was a preferable choice. For that reason, soil bulk mineralogy appears to be a good equivalent to complete soil mineralogy. Also, for Standard Sands (100% sand: C‐109, C‐190, NS‐04), improved λest were obtained by replacing λa with λa‐app. Finally, the deV‐1 model was successfully applied to 10 Chinese Soils and the following average SD values were obtained: for four coarse soils 0.135 W·m‐1·K‐1 while for six fine soils 0.127 W·m‐1·K‐1.

A Review And Evaluation Of Thermal Conductivity Models Of Saturated Soils

A new empirical model for the estimation of soil thermal conductivity

Simulation of soil thermal conductivity based on different schemes: An empirical comparison of 13 models

Thermal conductivity of soil: A review on the vast experimental data and predictive models

An Empirical Model for Estimating Soil Thermal Diffusivity from Texture, Bulk Density, and Degree of Saturation

A Generalized Relationship Between Thermal Conductivity and Matric Suction of Soils

Water and Heat Transport in Hilly Red Soil of Southern China: II. Modeling and Simulation.

An Empirical Model for Estimating Soil Thermal Conductivity from Texture, Water Content, and Bulk Density

An Improved Model for Predicting Soil Thermal Conductivity from Water Content at Room Temperature

Soil thermal conductivity model by de Vries: Re‐examination and validation analysis

Saturation Dependence of Thermal Conductivity of Soils: Classification and Estimations

Experimental Study and Modelling of the Thermal Conductivity of Sandy Soils of Different Porosities and Water Contents

An Implicit Model for Soil Thermal Conductivity and Matric Potential

Estimating the Components of Apparent Thermal Conductivity of Soils at Various Water Contents and Temperatures

Evaluation of solute diffusion tortuosity factor models for variously saturated soils

Relationship Between Thermal and Electrical Conductivity Curves of Soils with a Unimodal Pore Size Distribution: Part 2. Estimating Bulk Electrical Conductivity from Thermal Conductivity

Review of effective thermal conductivity models of rock-soil for geothermal energy applications

A sigmoidal model for predicting soil thermal conductivity-water content function in room temperature

Estimating Soil Water Retention Curves from Soil Thermal Conductivity Measurements

A Simplified De Vries‐based Model to Estimate Thermal Conductivity of Unfrozen and Frozen Soil

Evaluation of Model Concepts to Describe Water Transport in Shallow Subsurface Soil and Across the Soil–Air Interface