Sa1908 BERBERINE RESTORES MICROGLIA ACTIVATION INDUCED BY FECAL MICROBIOTA FROM IBS PATIENT IN GERM-FREE RATS WITH A DISTINCT EFFECT ON MICROBIOTA COMPARED WITH RIFAXIMIN

Lijin Song
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5085(20)31867-9
IF: 29.4
2020-01-01
Gastroenterology
Abstract:microbial population differences at the various time points.Canberra distances (a measure of beta diversity and dissimilarity) were used to assess how different the metabolite population was at the same time points.Results: After 6 days, both the microbiome (Weighted UniFrac, p=0.002) and metabolome (Canberra, p<0.001) across all timepoints were significantly different between the IHCmice and the control cohort.Microbiome beta diversity distances between the two conditions diverged during the time of IHC exposure.However, once this exposure was removed, the microbiome of the two conditions converged and was most similar during the dark/feeding period of the control cohort.This fluctuation in similarity itself had a circadian rhythm (MetaCycle, p<0.0001).A matrix with average Weighted UniFrac distances of the IHC and control samples from each time point showed which combinations resulted in the greatest differences and similarities.The peak was 283% the trough value.Metabolome beta diversity distances did not show similar divergence/ convergence patterns, staying consistent regardless of the time of collection (MetaCycle, p= 1).Conclusions: Gut microbiome composition is demonstrably more dynamic during the course of a day than its function as seen in the fecal metabolome.Furthermore, less scrupulous investigators could affect the perception of microbiome differences between their experimental and control cohorts by nearly 3-fold through manipulation of time of sample collection.Metabolomics data appears to be more resistant to this type of manipulation.Thus, reporting and controlling for time of collection in the methods section of microbiome studies should help improve reproducibility.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?