Abstract:PurposeThe purpose of this study is to determine the dimensions of cultural differences, which are theoretically most relevant to contract functions in international marketing. Moreover, the contradiction between contract governance and opportunism is reconciled by exploring the boundary conditions of specific cultural differences. Design/methodology/approachThe authors obtained 235 bilateral data provided by Chinese exporters and overseas distributors. The authors matched a secondary data set with the questionnaire data, which were analyzed by confirmatory factor analysis and a hierarchical moderation model. FindingsThe results demonstrate that while contract specificity is less successful in this area, contingency adaptability is useful in reducing opportunism. Moreover, as the national cultural differences regarding uncertainty avoidance, power distance or individualism-collectivism become more pronounced. One contractual dimension will be more effective at curbing opportunism, while the other will be less effective. Research limitations/implicationsDespite sample limitations, to the best of the authors' knowledge, this paper is the first to theoretically identify the effect of cultural difference dimensions in contract governance, unlike past studies taking cultural differences as an aggregated variable. Furthermore, by exploring the boundary conditions of cultural differences, this paper effectively reconciles the conflicting findings on the relationship between contract governance and opportunism in various cultural context. Practical implicationsExporters' managers can design contingency adaptability to complement the limitations of contract specificity and consider cultural differences' contingency effects. Originality/valueFirst, the authors identify cultural differences dimensions related to contract governance, refining and emphasizing the research context. Second, comparing the efficacy of contract specificity and contingency adaptability in specific cultural context can show which contract is better at preventing opportunism.

Opportunism, Identification Asymmetry, and Firm Performance in Chinese Interorganizational Relationships

How Do Chinese Firms Deal with Inter-Organizational Conflict?

Is Organizational Ambidexterity Always Beneficial to Family-Managed SMEs? Evidence from China

Inter-firm opportunism: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and effect on performance

Governing Buyer-Supplier Relationships Through Transactional And Relational Mechanisms: Evidence From China

Governing buyer–supplier relationships through transactional and relational mechanisms

The Dilemma of Inter-Organizational Relationships

Responses to Alliance Partners’ Misbehavior and Firm Performance in China: the Moderating Roles of Guanxi Orientation

Employment relationships and firm performance: evidence from an emerging economy

Managing opportunism in a developing interfirm relationship: The interrelationship of calculative and loyalty commitment

How Members' Managerial Social Capital Influences Their Opportunism in Interfirm Relationships

Reconsidering Network Embeddedness: Effects on Different Forms of Opportunism

Improving Performance and Reducing Cost in Buyer–supplier Relationships: the Role of Justice in Curtailing Opportunism

Organizational ambidexterity, market orientation, and firm performance

How to Inhibit a Partner's Strong and Weak Forms of Opportunism: Impacts of Network Embeddedness and Bilateral TSIs

Effects of External Uncertainties and Power on Opportunism in Supply Chains: Evidence from China

Good Connections with Rivals May Weaken a Firm’s Competitive Practices: the Negative Effect of Competitor Ties on Market Orientation Practices and Innovative Performance

Legitimizing Actions in Dependence-Asymmetry Relationships: A Comparison Between Chinese and Western Firms

Run Away or Stick Together: the Impact of Firm Misbehavior on Alliance Partners' Defection in China

Curbing opportunism in marketing channels: The roles of influence strategy and perceived fairness

The effect of cultural differences on the relationship between contract governance and opportunism