Abstract:Urban drainage models are important tools used by both practitioners and scientists in the field of stormwater management. These models are often conceptual and usually require calibration using local datasets. The quantification of the uncertainty associated with the models is a must, although it is rarely practiced. The International Working Group on Data and Models, which works under the IWA/IAHR Joint Committee on Urban Drainage, has been working on the development of a framework for defining and assessing uncertainties in the field of urban drainage modelling. A part of that work is the assessment and comparison of different techniques generally used in the uncertainty assessment of the parameters of water models. This paper compares a number of these techniques: the Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE), the Shuffled Complex Evolution Metropolis algorithm (SCEM-UA), an approach based on a multi-objective auto-calibration (a multialgorithm, genetically adaptive multi-objective method, AMALGAM) and a Bayesian approach based on a simplified Markov Chain Monte Carlo method (implemented in the software MICA). To allow a meaningful comparison among the different uncertainty techniques, common criteria have been set for the likelihood formulation, defining the number of simulations, and the measure of uncertainty bounds. Moreover, all the uncertainty techniques were implemented for the same case study, in which the same stormwater quantity and quality model was used alongside the same dataset. The comparison results for a well-posed rainfall/runoff model showed that the four methods provide similar probability distributions of model parameters, and model prediction intervals. For ill-posed water quality model the differences between the results were much wider; and the paper provides the specific advantages and disadvantages of each method. In relation to computational efficiency (i.e. number of iterations required to generate the probability distribution of parameters), it was found that SCEM-UA and AMALGAM produce results quicker than GLUE in terms of required number of simulations. However, GLUE requires the lowest modelling skills and is easy to implement. All non-Bayesian methods have problems with the way they accept behavioural parameter sets, e.g. GLUE, SCEM-UA and AMALGAM have subjective acceptance thresholds, while MICA has usually problem with its hypothesis on normality of residuals. It is concluded that modellers should select the method which is most suitable for the system they are modelling (e.g. complexity of the model's structure including the number of parameters), their skill/knowledge level, the available information, and the purpose of their study.

Uncertainty Assessment of Urban Hydrological Modelling from a Multiple Objective Perspective

Uncertainty Analysis in Statistical Modeling of Extreme Hydrological Events

Uncertainty in High and Low Flows Due to Model Structure and Parameter Errors

Impact Of Two Calibration Strategies On Flow Simulation In Qiantang River Basin, China

Impact of Spatial Variation and Uncertainty of Rainfall Intensity on Urban Flooding Assessment

Urban Flood Risk Assessment Using Storm Characteristic Parameters Sensitive to Catchment-Specific Drainage System

Comparison of different uncertainty techniques in urban stormwater quantity and quality modelling

BK-SWMM flood simulation framework is being proposed for urban storm flood modeling based on uncertainty parameter crowdsourcing data from a single functional region

Urban Pluvial Flood Modeling by Coupling Raster-Based Two-Dimensional Hydrodynamic Model and SWMM

Uncertainty in Simulation of Land-Use Change Impacts on Catchment Runoff with Multi-Timescales Based on the Comparison of the HSPF and SWAT Models

An Improved Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis Approach Using a Multicriteria Sequential Algorithm for Hydrological Modeling

A novel integrated urban flood risk assessment approach based on one-two dimensional coupled hydrodynamic model and improved projection pursuit method

Uncertainties of urban flood modeling: Influence of parameters for different underlying surfaces

Integrated Assessment of Urban Drainage System under the Framework of Uncertainty Analysis

Urban Flood Modeling and Risk Assessment with Limited Observation Data: The Beijing Future Science City of China

Uncertainty assessment in watershed-scale water quality modeling and management: 1. Framework and application of generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) approach

Approach for evaluating inundation risks in urban drainage systems

Combining the Swat Model with Sequential Uncertainty Fitting Algorithm for Streamflow Prediction and Uncertainty Analysis for the Lake Dianchi Basin, China

Research on Urban Storm Flood Simulation by Coupling K-means Machine Learning Algorithm and GIS Spatial Analysis Technology into SWMM Model

Urban Flood Resilience Evaluation Based on Heterogeneous Data and Group Decision-Making

Impacts of changes in the watershed partitioning level and optimization algorithm on runoff simulation: decomposition of uncertainties