A DIFFERENCE-IN-DIFFERENCE BASED CT RADIOMICS ALGORITHM FOR DETECTING RECURRENCE OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA AFTER RESECTION OR ABLATION: AN EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS

Zhihang Chen,Jingxian Shen,Qian Zhou,Sui Peng,Ming Kuang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2019-IDDFabstracts.251
IF: 24.5
2019-01-01
Gut
Abstract:Background Early detection of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can make early intervention available. This study aimed to find radiomics features to improve the performance of detecting recurrence based on computer tomography (CT). Methods The retrospective study included a training cohort of 35 patients and a validation cohort of 62 patients. A series of follow-up CT images of patients with primary HCC after surgical resection or ablation were collected from January 2009 to April 2018. Tumor and liver regions of interest (ROI) were manually delineated on CT1 (within one month after resection or ablation), CT2 (when suspicious recurrence was observed) and CT3 (when confirmed recurrence was observed). Radiomics features were extracted and a radiomics algorithm, ‘difference-in-difference’ (DD) was established for detecting recurrence. Folded cross validation (CV) was used. Results A total of 256 follow-up images were available for analysis. The training cohort was divided into recurrence and no recurrence group, with 18 patients and 17 patients, respectively. Our radiomics algorithm selected 17 DD radiomics features for detecting recurrence using univariable analysis. Principle component analysis showed that an Area Under the Receiver Operator Characteristic Curve (AUC) of the first principle component of 17 selected DD features achieved 0.97 (95% CI: 0.92–1.00). Leave-one-out CV produced an error of 18.2% and 10-fold CV with a highest error as 19.1%. Incorporating post-treatment alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), there was no significant increase in AUC compared with the first principal component of 17 DD features alone (0.97 vs 0.97, Z=0.346, P=0.730). In the validation cohort, univariable analysis showed that the variation trend of radiomics features was suggestive of recurrence. Conclusions Difference-in-difference of CT radiomics features improved performance of conventional CT and was superior to AFP in detecting recurrence of HCC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?