IDDF2019-ABS-0148 Focal Liver Lesion Classification Using a Convolutional Neural Network Based Transfer-Learning Algorithm on Tri-Phase Images of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

Hang-Tong Hu,Ming Kuang,Ming-De Lu,Xiao-Yan Xie,Sui Peng,Wei Wang,Xin Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2019-iddfabstracts.274
IF: 24.5
2019-01-01
Gut
Abstract:Background To investigate the potential of a deep learning convolutional neural network (CNN) model for focal liver lesion (FLL) differentiation using tri-phase images of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) and transfer-learning algorithm. And to preliminarily explore the integration of radiologist experience and artificial intelligence in medical imaging. Methods CEUS images of 527 patients over three phases (un-enhanced, early arterial and late portal phases) were manually pre-processed into square frames. Supervised CNN was designed as the 152-layer ResNet trained on each phase frames separately and assembled by SVM algorithm. The model was trained on 55350 augmented frames and tested on 474 un-augmented frames. The performance was evaluated on stability and efficiency, and compared with radiologist diagnoses which were based on pre-processed frames first and then on videos with full access to patients‘ clinical information. Integration of CNN and radiologist experience was performed through assemble of the CNN outputs and radiologist diagnoses by SVM algorithm. Results The CNN model was stable among radiologists (ACC: 0.85–0.88; SEN: 0.89–0.94; SPE: 0.67–0.70). While radiologist diagnosed basing on frames varied significantly (ACC: 0.65–0.82; SEN: 0.62–0.90; SPE: 0.55–0.82) and no rules could be found between the variation and radiologists’ experience. However, for diagnoses based on videos, the trend could be found that SPE increased with a higher radiologist’s experience (0.61 vs. 0.91, P<0.01). For diagnostic efficiency, the frames based CNN model and videos based diagnoses were similar for the less-experienced radiologist. While for the experienced radiologist, the CNN model had a significantly lower SPE (0.70 vs. 0.91, P<0.01) (figure 1A). Integration of the CNN and radiologist’s experience achieved good stability. Performance was an improvement for the less-experienced radiologist (SPE: 0.76 vs. 0.61, P<0.01) but a setback for the experienced radiologist (SPE: 0.79 vs. 0.91, P<0.01) (figure 1B).Abstract IDDF2019-ABS-0148 Figure 1 A) CNN model test results Conclusions The CNN model showed good stability that overcame the operator-dependent disadvantage of CEUS. The integrated model of the CNN and radiologist’s experience could significantly improve the performance of less-experienced radiologists, but not for the experienced radiologists.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?