The Effect of Laser Energy Consumption on the Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Early Stage after HoLEP

Ke Liu,Chunlei Xiao,Lulin Ma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s2666-1683(20)33421-2
IF: 7.6
2020-01-01
The Journal of Urology
Abstract:INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: HoLEP has gained popularity for management of voiding symptoms associated with BPH with long-term efficacy. However, postoperative lower urinary tract symptoms could be bothersome and significantly interfere with the patients’ daily activities, especially in the early stage after catheter removal. We evaluate the effect of the laser energy that consumed during the HoLEP procedure on the lower urinary tract symptoms in early stage after surgery. METHODS: From May 2018 to May 2019, there were 50 patients who underwent HoLEP in our hospital because of BPH. All the patients were performed pressure flow study to exclude OAB. The patients were divided equally into 2 groups (high and low) based on the total energy (TE), the energy per unit prostatic volume (EUPV), and the energy per unit enucleation time (EUET), successively. The patients were followed up on 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after the surgery. The international prostate symptom subscore of storage (IPSS-S) and voiding (IPSS-V) were done separately to estimate the LUTs symptoms. The recovery of urinary continence (RUC) was recorded. The difference of IPSS, IPSS-S, IPSS-V, and the rate of RUC between each 2 groups were statistical analyzed. RESULTS: Grouping by TE and EUPV, there were no significant differences in terms of IPSS, IPSS-S, and IPSS-V on 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months separately. Grouping by EUET, there were no significant differences in terms of IPSS and IPSS-V at each follow-up point. However, the IPSS-S of high EUET group was significant higher than that of low EUET group on 1 week, which were 10.6(SD2.88) and 6.2(SD2.86) separately (P=0.042). There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to IPSS-S on 1 month and 3 months. The rate of RUC in high TE group was significant lower than that in low TE group on 1 month, which were 76% versus 96% (P=0.042). Nevertheless there were no significant differences between groups on 1 week and 3 months. Moreover, there were no significant differences between groups which were divided based on EUET and EUPV at each follow-up point. CONCLUSIONS: The high consumption of energy per unit time during the HoLEP procedure is associated with more severe postoperative storage symptoms and delayed RUC in early stage after surgery. Source of Funding: None.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?