Abstract:Bioclimatic covariates that are usually used to model species ranges often won't show strong variation at scales of 100s and 10s of meters creating a challenge for creating range maps for species with small distributions. We demonstrate how a flexible analytical approach can improves estimates of both distribution and uncertainty and identify key abiotic relationships at smaller scales. We present analyses of species distributions, at 100 × 100 m resolution, for a highly range restricted salamander species (Shenandoah salamander) and a closely related congener (red‐backed salamander). While our approach is especially valuable for species with small ranges, controlling for spatial autocorrelation, estimating spatial uncertainty, and incorporating survey‐specific information in estimates can improve the reliability of most distribution models. Estimating distributions for cryptic and highly range‐restricted species induces unique challenges for species distribution modeling. In particular, bioclimatic covariates that are typically used to model species ranges at regional and continental scales may not show strong variation at scales of 100s and 10s of meters. This limits both the likelihood and usefulness of correlated occurrence to data typically used in distribution models. Here, we present analyses of species distributions, at 100 × 100 m resolution, for a highly range restricted salamander species (Shenandoah salamander, Plethodon shenandoah) and a closely related congener (red‐backed salamander, Plethodon cinereus). We combined data across multiple survey types, account for seasonal variation in availability of our target species, and control for repeated surveys at locations– all typical challenges in range‐scale monitoring datasets. We fit distribution models using generalized additive models that account for spatial covariates as well as unexplained spatial variation and spatial uncertainty. Our model accommodates different survey protocols using offsets and incorporates temporal variation in detection and availability resulting from survey‐specific variation in temperature and precipitation. Our spatial random effect was crucial in identifying small‐scale differences in the occurrence of each species and provides cell‐specific estimates of uncertainty in the density of salamanders across the range. Counts of both species were seen to increase in the 3 days following a precipitation event. However, P. cinereus were observed even in extremely wet conditions, while surface activity of P. shenandoah was associated with a more narrow range. Our results demonstrate how a flexible analytical approach improves estimates of both distribution and uncertainty, and identify key abiotic relationships, even at small spatial scales and when scales of empirical data are mismatched. While our approach is especially valuable for species with small ranges, controlling for spatial autocorrelation, estimating spatial uncertainty, and incorporating survey‐specific information in estimates can improve the reliability of distribution models in general.

Deciding where to put them: Sensitivity tests and independent evaluation are critical when using species distribution models to inform conservation translocations

Study extent influences the predictions and performance of species distribution models: a case study of six amphibian species at the edge of their geographic distributions in western Canada

Updated range map of an endangered salamander and congeneric competitor reveals different niche preferences

Using Spatial Capture–Recapture to Elucidate Population Processes and Space-Use in Herpetological Studies

Determining Threatened Species Distributions in the Face of Limited Data: Spatial Conservation Prioritization for the Chinese Giant Salamander (andrias Davidianus).

The shadow model: how and why small choices in spatially explicit species distribution models affect predictions

Data‐centric species distribution modeling: Impacts of modeler decisions in a case study of invasive European frog‐bit

Abiotic and Biotic Influences on the Movement of Reintroduced Chinese Giant Salamanders (andrias Davidianus) in Two Montane Rivers

Reducing uncertainty with iterative model updating parses effects of competition and environment on salamander occupancy

Capturing response differences of species distribution to climate and human pressures by incorporating local adaptation: Implications for the conservation of a critically endangered species

How sensitive are species distribution models to different background point selection strategies? A test with species at various equilibrium levels

A Test of Species Distribution Model Transferability Across Environmental and Geographic Space for 108 Western North American Tree Species

Assessing the reliability of species distribution projections in climate change research

Presence-only species distribution models are sensitive to sample prevalence: Evaluating models using spatial prediction stability and accuracy metrics

Assessing abundance–suitability models to prioritize conservation areas for the dwarf caimans in South America

Physiological and morphological traits affect contemporary range expansion and implications for species distribution modelling in an amphibian species

Improving the spatial transferability of species distribution models to inform biological conservation of two piscivore fish species

Beyond a diagnostic tool: Validating standardized Mahalanobis distance as a species distribution model for invasive alien species in North America

Intraspecific Variation in Microhabitat Selection in Reintroduced Chinese Giant Salamanders.

Evaluating species distribution model predictions through time against paleozoological records

Local and landscape drivers of the number of individuals and genetic diversity of a microendemic and critically endangered salamander