Systematic Review of Atorvastatin for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease

Yuan Sun,Shuyan Chen,Gengfa Wang,Zhihong Pang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.08.502
IF: 4.039
2011-01-01
International Journal of Cardiology
Abstract:Objective: To assess the clinical efficacy and safety of atorvastatin in the treatment of Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Methods: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM disc, and grey literature sources were searched for RCTs without limitation of language. The quality of literature was assessed using a simple evaluative method with grades A, B, and C, as recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration. Literature with grade A or B was selected. Two independent reviewers extracted and assessed data independently and agreement was reached after discussion. Revman 5.1 was used for data management and analysis, and obtained evidence for the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin in the treatment of AD. Results: Two RCTs were included, and for methodology quality of literatures, one was A scale, another was B. All patients (710 participants, age range 50–90 years) had a diagnosis of probable or possible mild to moderate AD according to standard criteria and treated with atorvastatin 80 mg/d or placebo. When data were pooled there was considerable heterogeneity, so the random effects model was used. The combined results showed that there was no difference in total assessment ([WMD=0.13, 95% CI (−0.15, 0.40), P=0.38] (CGIC, last follow-up)), cognition ([WMD=1.05, 95% CI (−3.06, 6.05), P=0.52] (ADAS-Cog, 52w); [WMD=0.77, 95% CI (−0.57, 2.10), P=0.26] (MMSE, 52w)), and behavioral disturbance ([WMD=2.07, 95% CI (0.66, 8.04), P=0.27] (NPI, 52w)). Severe adverse effects and increased liver function trials were available from two studies. Severe adverse effects have no significant difference between atorvastatin and placebo [OR=2.31, 95% CI (0.66, 8.04), P=0.19], while increased liver function trials were higher in treatment group [OR=7.86, 95% CI (2.50, 24.69), P=0.0004]. Conclusion: There is insufficient evidence to recommend atorvastatin for the treatment of mild to moderate AD. This would need to be confirmed in larger, high-quality RCTs, especially for moderate to severe AD.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?