Modelling of Soil Solid Thermal Conductivity

Hailong He,Min Li,Miles Dyck,Bingcheng Si,Jinxin Wang,Jialong Lv

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2020.104602

IF: 7.366

2021-01-01

Soil and Tillage Research

Abstract:Soil solid thermal conductivity (lambda(s)) is critical to model effective soil thermal conductivity (lambda(eff)) that is required for engineering design and estimate of soil surface energy flux and soil temperature. However, it is impossible to measure lambda(s) because soil is a porous medium and there is no way to compact the soil to a continuous solid state without any pore spaces. The indirect estimation of lambda(s) requires saturation of the soils or a complete soil mineralogical information or mineral component such as quartz that has much greater thermal conductivity. Therefore, many approximation approaches of various complexities to predict lambda(s) have been proposed. However, few studies have been conducted to assess these models. An extensive review were conducted and returned 20 models to calculate lambda(s). These models were categorized and their performances were assessed with a compiled dataset consisting of 65 soils from five studies. The results showed that the Johansen approach can give satisfactory lambda(s) given that quartz content is available (RMSE = 0.60 W m(-1) degrees C-1, NSE = 0.91) and the Tarnawski et al. model suitable for Canadian soils (RMSE = 0.55 W m(-1) degrees C-1, NSE = 0.92). The Cote and Konrad approach that inversely model lambda(s) based on the geometric mean model and measured soil thermal conductivity at full saturation (lambda(sat)) give accurate lambda(s) (RMSE = 0.22 W m(-1) degrees C-1, NSE = 0.99), but cannot be applied to soils without lambda(sat) measurement. The other approaches that take use of soil thermal conductivity at dryness (lambda(dry)) give unsatisfactory lambda(s). Therefore, a new three-point method (three measurements between lambda(dry) and lambda(sat)) based on the He et al. model was proposed to predict lambda(s). The results showed this approach provides a reliable method to estimate lambda(s) (RMSE = 0.17 W m(-1) degrees C-1, NSE = 0.99) at various textures and water contents without knowledge on mineralogical information.