Abstract:A family of copper coordination polymers containing different N-heterocyclic ligands, namely [Cu(CN)(dmpyz)](n) (1), [Cu-2(CN)(2)(imz)](n) (2), [Cu-3(CN)(trz)(2)], (3), [Cu-6(CN)(6)(dmtrz)(3)](n) (4), [Cu-2(CN)(5-metta)](n) (5), [Cu-2(CN)(5-phtta)](n) (6), and ([Cu-6(CN)(6)(dmtrz)](2)[Cu-2(CN)(2)(dmtrz)(2)])(n) (7) has been prepared and structurally characterized by X-ray crystallography. The crystal structures of 1 and 2 are 11) chain frameworks. Compound 3 is a twofold interpenetrating 21) supra-molecular framework in which the cyanide groups act as bridging ligands to link the copper centers into an unusual bilayer motif with large channels. Compounds 4-6 all possess 31) networks. Compound 4 is constructed by two parts: 21) rectangular-grid layers and (Cu-2(CN)(2)(dmtrz)(2)) building blocks. Compound 5 is built up by X-shaped chains that connect each other in an ABAB arrangement to generate the 31) network. The structure of 6 is a 31) network including one-dimensional square-grid channels, with a shortest Cu2 center dot center dot center dot Cu2A (A: -x + 1, -y + 1, -z) distance of about 2.347(1) angstrom. Compound 7 features a peculiar 3D + 1D network in which 1D guest metal-organic polymer chains are filled in an unusual 3D architecture constructed by double helical host tubes. Compounds 1-7 show a systematic variation in dimensionality from 1D to 3D to 3D + 1D. The luminescence properties of these compounds have been also studied.((c) Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2006).

Construction and Electrochemical Reversibility of Two Copper(ii) Coordination Polymers Assembled from P-Terphenyl-2,2′',5′',5′''-tetracarboxylate Acid

Crystal Structure, Electrochemical Reversibility, and Photocatalytic Degradation of a Coordination Unsaturated Copper(ii) Based Coordination Polymer

Construction of Copper(I) Coordination Polymers of 1,2,4,5-Tetracyanobenzene with Zigzag Sheet and Porous Frameworks.

Synthesis and Crystal Structures of Two Novel Copper(Ii) Coordination Polymers Constructed from Different Ligands

Three Copper(II) Coordination Polymers Constructed by Both Rigid and Flexible Ligands

Three 3d Cu(Ii) Coordination Polymers Constructed from 1,2,4,5-Benzenetetracarboxylate Acid and Three Positional Isomeric Ligands

Construction of Cu(ii) Coordination Polymers Based on Semi-Rigid Tetrahedral Pyridine Ligands

Synthesis and Characterization of Two Novel Cu(II) Coordination Polymers with Helical Crystal Structure

Synthesis, Structural Characterization and Properties of Copper(II) and Zinc(II) Coordination Polymers with a New Bridging Chelating Ligand

High Efficiency Electrochemiluminescence for Copper(II) and Cadmium(II) Pyrazolate Polymers

One-dimensional Cu(II) coordination polymers containing C2h-symmetric 1,1':4',1''-terphenyl-3,3'-dicarboxylate linkers

Synthesis of two polymorphic Cu-based coordination polymers of 1,2,4-benzenetricarboxylic acid along with a carbon-coated composite for the selective degradation of organic dyes

Two Copper(Ii) Coordination Polymers Constructed by Bis(4-(1h-Imidazol-1-Yl) Phenyl) Methanone and Dicarboxylate Ligands

Two New Coordination Polymers Based on N-heterocyclic Carboxylic Acids

Synthesis and Characterization of Two Novel Cu(Ⅱ) Coordination Polymers with Helical Crystal Structure

Construction of Coordination Polymers Based on Tetrabromoterephthalic Acid and Different Nitrogen-Containing Ligands

A Series of One- to Three-Dimensional Copper Coordination Polymers Based on N-Heterocyclic Ligands

Two Copper(ii) Complexes Containing the Common Chain Structures with Different Charge States

Three 2 D Copper(ii)/cadmium(ii) Coordination Polymers Based on Semi-Rigid/flexible Bis-Pyridyl-bis-amide Ligands and 5-Aminoisophthalate: Syntheses, Structures and Properties

Mixed Solvothermal Synthesis and Characterization of Two Copper Coordination Polymers:Cu_3(2,2'-bipy)_2(C_8H_4O_4)_2(C_8H_5O_4)_2 and Cu(Ⅰ)Cu(Ⅱ)(4,4'-bipy)_(1.5)(C_8H4_O_4)(C_8H_5O_4)

Metal Disordering Cu(ii) Supramolecular Polymers Constructed from a Tripodal Ligand Possessing Two Different Functional Groups