Screening for Early‐Stage Parkinson's Disease: Swallow Tail Sign on MRI Susceptibility Map‐Weighted Images Compared with PET

Na Wang,Xue-ling Liu,Ling Li,Chuan-tao Zuo,Jian Wang,Pu-yeh Wu,Yong Zhang,Fengtao Liu,YuXin Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27386
IF: 4.4
2020-01-01
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract:BackgroundSwallow tail sign (STS) on MRI is presumed to be an imaging biomarker of nigrosome‐1, which may exhibit a similar role as positron emission tomography (PET), indicating dopaminergic degeneration.PurposeTo investigate whether an alteration of STS could serve as an alternative screening sign compared with PET in the diagnosis of early‐stage Parkinson's disease (esPD).Study TypeProspective.PopulationThirty‐seven patients with esPD and 27 age‐ and sex‐matched healthy controls (HCs).Field Strength/SequenceQuantitative susceptibility mapping images were collected on 3T MRI and [18F]9‐fluoropropyl‐(+)‐dihydrotetra‐benazine PET images were acquired using a 64 rings PET/CT scanner.AssessmentAlterations of STS and striatal uptake in each hemisphere were visually rated on a 0–2 points scale. Point 2: normal appearance of STS/normal striatal uptake; Point 1: partial loss of STS/uptake reduction confined to the putamen; Point 0: total loss of STS/uptake reduction extended to the caudate nucleus. The concordance rate of STS rating and ipsilateral striatal binding was calculated at the nuclei level. At the participant level, an evaluation rating was calculated by adding the STS ratings from both hemispheres to distinguish esPD from HCs.Statistical TestsThe intra‐ and interobserver agreement were tested using Cohen's kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient. Hotelling's T‐squared test was used to compare the difference of rating points. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic power.ResultsThe intra‐ and interobserver agreement for STS and striatal uptake rating was over 0.75. There was no significant difference of rating point distribution (P = 0.084). The concordance rate was 94.3% for the right side and 91.4% for the left. Using bilateral partial loss of STS as the threshold, the achieved sensitivity and specificity for discriminating esPD from HCs were 94.59% and 92.49%, respectively.Data ConclusionSTS alterations corresponded well with striatal uptake on PET in esPD, and our proposed evaluation scale of STS had satisfactory diagnostic performance in discriminating the disease.Level of Evidence2Technical EfficacyStage 2
What problem does this paper attempt to address?