Bedside Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism by Saline Contrast–enhanced Electrical Impedance Tomography: Considerations for Future Research

Yuxian Wang,Ming Zhong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202009-3640le

IF: 24.7

2021-01-01

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract:vasopressor medications (MAP of 72 mm Hg and heart rate of 94 bpm). During the recruitment maneuver, _ Q increased by 2.7 L/min, stroke volume increased by 8 ml/beat (both measured by transpulmonary thermodilution), and MAP increased by 20 mm Hg (Figure 1 [case 2]). We also observed a decreased stroke volume variation (from 16% to 6%) and no changes in central venous pressure (13–14 cm H2O). His heart rate was 103 bpm. PEEP was set at 20 cm H2O. The improved blood pressure allowed the epinephrine dose to be decreased rapidly during and in the hours after lung recruitment (no fluid challenges were administered). Taken together, both the data presented in our manuscript and these two cases make us hypothesize that high pleural pressure acts like a shield for the cardiovascular system against high ventilator pressures. Prior investigations of the effects of positive-pressure ventilation on heart–lung interactions did not examine the role of high baseline pleural pressure (3–5). As shown in the patients represented in Figure 1, the counterbalance of high pleural pressure due to obesity permitted the use of high airway pressures that not only improved respiratory system compliance (reduced driving pressure) and lung volumes but also raised _ Q and systemic blood pressure. The increased pleural pressure prevents high-airway-pressure lung injury (6) and hemodynamic collapse (7) that might otherwise occur during highpressure ventilation in patients with low baseline pleural pressures. Future studies are needed to determine the validity of our hypothesis. n