High Tumor Mitochondrial DNA Content Correlates with an Improved Patient's Outcome in WHO Grade III Meningioma.

Lingyang Hua,Tareq A. Juratli,Hongda Zhu,Jiaojiao Deng,Daijun Wang,Shuchen Sun,Qing Xie,Hiroaki Wakimoto,Ye Gong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.542294
IF: 4.7
2020-01-01
Frontiers in Oncology
Abstract:Background:Studies have shown mitochondrial genome content (mtDNA content) varies in many malignancies. However, its distribution and prognostic values in high-grade meningioma remain largely unknown. In this retrospective study, we sought to assess a putative correlation between the mtDNA content and clinical characteristics. Methods:Mitochondrial DNA was extracted from 87 World Health Organization grade III meningioma samples using a qPCR method. The distribution of mtDNA content in WHO grade III meningioma and its correlations with clinical variables were assessed. Furthermore, we prognostic values were also determined. Results:Mean mtDNA content was 617.7 (range, 0.8-3000). There was no mtDNA distribution difference based on the histological subtypes (P= 0.07). Tumors with preoperative radiation were associated with lower mtDNA content (P= 0.041), whereas no correlations with other clinical variables were observed. A high mtDNA content was associated with significantly better PFS (P= 0.044) and OS (P= 0.019). However, in patients who received postoperative radiotherapy, low mtDNA content was associated with better PFS (P= 0.028), while no difference in OS was observed (P= 0.272). Low mtDNA content was also associated with better OS and PFS in subgroups of patients with ER negative status (PFS,P= 0.002; OS,P= 0.002). Conclusions:Consistent with other tumors, high mtDNA content was associated with better outcome in WHO grade III meningioma in our cohort. However, for patients who received post-operative radiation therapy, low mtDNA content was associated with better PFS. These findings suggest that mtDNA content may further be explored as a potential biomarker for high-grade meningioma patients and for those who received postoperative radiation therapy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?