Abstract:Legal judgment prediction (LJP) is a significant task in legal intelligence, which aims to assist the judges and determine the judgment result based on the case's fact description. The judgment result consists of law articles, charge, and prison term. The law articles serve as the basis for the charge and the prison term, which can be divided into two types, named as charge-related law article and term-related law article, respectively. Recently, many methods have been proposed and made tremendous progress in LJP. However, the existing methods only focus on the prediction of the charge-related law articles, ignoring the term-related law articles (e.g., laws about lenient treatment), which limits the performance in the prison term prediction. In this paper, following the actual legal process, we expand the law article prediction as a multi-label classification task that includes both the charge-related law articles and term-related law articles and propose a novel multi-law aware LJP (ML-LJP) method to improve the performance of LJP. Given the case's fact description, firstly, the label (e.g., law article and charge) definitions in the Code of Law are used to transform the representation of the fact into several label-specific representations and make the prediction of the law articles and the charge. To distinguish the similar content of different label definitions, contrastive learning is conducted in the training. Then, a graph attention network (GAT) is applied to learn the interactions among the multiple law articles for the prediction of the prison term. Since numbers (e.g., amount of theft and weight of drugs) are important for LJP but often ignored by conventional encoders, we design a corresponding number representation method to locate and better represent these effective numbers. Extensive experiments on real-world dataset show that our method achieves the best results compared to the state-of-the-art models, especially in the task of prison term prediction where ML-LJP achieves a 10.07% relative improvement over the best baseline.

Multi-task Reading for Intelligent Legal Services

Various Legal Factors Extraction Based on Machine Reading Comprehension.

Creating a Children-Friendly Reading Environment via Joint Learning of Content and Human Attention

Automatic Judgment Prediction via Legal Reading Comprehension

Augmented and challenging datasets with multi-step reasoning and multi-span questions for Chinese judicial reading comprehension

CJRC: A Reliable Human-Annotated Benchmark DataSet for Chinese Judicial Reading Comprehension

LawLLM: Law Large Language Model for the US Legal System

A Multi-answer Multi-task Framework for Real-world Machine Reading Comprehension.

Iterative Self-Supervised Learning for Legal Similar Case Retrieval

Empirical Evaluations of Active Learning Strategies in Legal Document Review

LegalReasoner: A Multi-Stage Framework for Legal Judgment Prediction via Large Language Models and Knowledge Integration

LexEval: A Comprehensive Chinese Legal Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models

Legal judgment prediction via optimized multi-task learning fusing similarity correlation

MMM: Multi-stage Multi-task Learning for Multi-choice Reading Comprehension

M3: A Multi-View Fusion and Multi-Decoding Network for Multi-Document Reading Comprehension.

ML-LJP: Multi-Law Aware Legal Judgment Prediction

Legal Judgment Prediction with Multi-Stage CaseRepresentation Learning in the Real Court Setting

Legal Judgment Prediction with Multi-Stage Case Representation Learning in the Real Court Setting

An Empirical Study of Law Articles Prediction on Transportation Legal Cases

MVE-FLK: A multi-task legal judgment prediction via multi-view encoder fusing legal keywords