Hock-a-loogie Saliva As a Diagnostic Specimen for SARS-CoV-2 by a PCR-based Assay: A Diagnostic Validity Study

Jian Fan,Fei Yu,Xiang Wang,Qianda Zou,Bin Lou,Guoliang Xie,Xianzhi Yang,Weizhen Chen,Qi Wang,Dan Zhang,Ruonan Wang,Baihuan Feng,Yuejiao Dong,Li Huang,Yun Teng,Zhenzhen Deng,Ling Yu,Kaijin Xu,Jifang Sheng,Shufa Zheng,Yu Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.10.004
IF: 6.314
2020-01-01
Clinica Chimica Acta
Abstract:To clarify the effect of different respiratory sample types on SARS-CoV-2 detection, we collected throat swabs, nasal swabs and hock-a-loogie saliva or sputum, and compared their detection rates and viral loads. The detection rates of sputum (95.65%, 22/23) and hock-a-loogie saliva (88.09%, 37/42) were significantly higher than those in throat swabs (41.54%, 27/65) and nasal swabs (72.31%, 47/65) (P < 0.001). The Ct Values of sputum, hock-a-loogie saliva and nasal swabs were significantly higher than that in throat swabs, whereas no significant difference was observed between sputum and saliva samples. Hock-a-loogie saliva are reliable sample types that can be used to detect SARS-CoV-2, and worthy of clinical promotion.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?