Abstract:Reward-motivated memory has been studied extensively in psychology and neuroscience. Most studies follow the same type of paradigm: stimuli are cued at encoding with high or low reward values which indicate the amount the stimulus is worth if successfully remembered on a subsequent memory test, usually recognition. Each incorrect endorsement of a lure at retrieval is penalized with an arbitrary value between the high and low reward value, resulting in a single false alarm rate. Studies employing this type of paradigm have reported higher hit rates for high value items compared to low value items, but generally hit rate is the only measure of memory that is reported as a function of reward value. This leaves open the possibility that high reward items have a higher hit rate because participants are more willing to endorse those items as “old”, due to biases in the reward structure of these paradigms. Other measures, like discriminability and response bias, are overlooked when there is only a single false alarm rate, but we hypothesize that these other measures are also susceptible to motivational manipulations. To test whether reward motivation influences these other factors, we created a novel paradigm that associated rewards with categories (indoor vs. outdoor scenes), allowing for a separate false alarm rate as well as hit rate at each level of reward. We report results of three experiments that varied when reward cues were introduced and the penalties associated with false alarms for the categorized items. We replicated prior findings of higher hit rates for high compared to low reward items, but consistently across three experiments, when d’ was calculated, we found no difference in memory discriminability as a function of reward. Further, in two experiments we found that response bias was more conservative for low reward items: participants were more likely to endorse a “new” response to low compared to high reward items. This latter effect of reward on response bias did not occur when the amount of the false alarm penalty matched the possible reward. Our findings reveal that reward motivation influences memory, but also decisional biases thought to be independent of memory processes. The amount of both the reward value of the target items, and the amount of the false alarm penalty should be considered when designing experimental paradigms to study motivation-cognition interactions.

The Influence of Rewards on Incidental Memory: More Does Not Mean Better.

The Interactive Effect of External Rewards and Self-Determined Choice on Memory

Memory for rewards guides retrieval

Reward association impairs recognition of incidentally encoded negative information: Electrophysiological evidence

Reward Motivation Influences Response Bias on a Recognition Memory Task

The effect of reward-induced arousal on the success and precision of episodic memory retrieval

The interaction between reward and the task-irrelevant emotional context in memory

Do Immediate External Rewards Really Enhance Intrinsic Motivation?

High Reward Enhances Perceptual Learning

The Effect of Choice on Intentional and Incidental Memory.

Reward Prompts Visual Short-Term Memory Consolidation

Dopaminergic inputs in the dentate gyrus direct the choice of memory encoding.

Reward motivation more consistently modulates memory for younger compared to older adults in a directed forgetting task.

Context and Time Matter: Effects of Emotion and Motivation on Episodic Memory Overtime.

Does Stimulus Emotionality Influence Associative Memory? Insights from Directed Forgetting

Reactivation of Learned Reward Association Reduces Retroactive Interference From New Reward Learning

A Dual Reward-Place Association Task to Study the Preferential Retention of Relevant Memories in Rats

The effect of noninstrumental information on reward learning

Reward produces learning of a consciously inaccessible feature

No effect of monetary reward in a visual working memory task

Intrinsic monitoring of learning success facilitates memory encoding via the activation of the SN/VTA-Hippocampal loop