Abstract:Recent likelihood theory produces $p$-values that have remarkable accuracy and wide applicability. The calculations use familiar tools such as maximum likelihood values (MLEs), observed information and parameter rescaling. The usual evaluation of such $p$-values is by simulations, and such simulations do verify that the global distribution of the $p$-values is uniform(0, 1), to high accuracy in repeated sampling. The derivation of the $p$-values, however, asserts a stronger statement, that they have a uniform(0, 1) distribution conditionally, given identified precision information provided by the data. We take a simple regression example that involves exact precision information and use large sample techniques to extract highly accurate information as to the statistical position of the data point with respect to the parameter: specifically, we examine various $p$-values and Bayesian posterior survivor $s$-values for validity. With observed data we numerically evaluate the various $p$-values and $s$-values, and we also record the related general formulas. We then assess the numerical values for accuracy using Markov chain Monte Carlo (McMC) methods. We also propose some third-order likelihood-based procedures for obtaining means and variances of Bayesian posterior distributions, again followed by McMC assessment. Finally we propose some adaptive McMC methods to improve the simulation acceptance rates. All these methods are based on asymptotic analysis that derives from the effect of additional data. And the methods use simple calculations based on familiar maximizing values and related informations. The example illustrates the general formulas and the ease of calculations, while the McMC assessments demonstrate the numerical validity of the $p$-values as percentage position of a data point. The example, however, is very simple and transparent, and thus gives little indication that in a wide generality of models the formulas do accurately separate information for almost any parameter of interest, and then do give accurate $p$-value determinations from that information. As illustration an enigmatic problem in the literature is discussed and simulations are recorded; various examples in the literature are cited.

Bayesian inference under small sample size -- A noninformative prior approach

Bayesian Inference under Small Sample Sizes Using General Noninformative Priors

A Bayesian approach on sample size calculation for comparing means.

On Using Bayesian Methods to Address Small Sample Problems

Self-Adapted and Filtered Qualitative Maximum a Posterior Algorithm for Small Data Sets.

Bayesian Hypothesis Tests Using Nonparametric Statistics

Bayesian predictive inference under informative sampling and transformation

Two Small Samples Bayesian Test Based on Conjugate Prior Distribution and the Instance Analysis

A Method of Fuzzy Probability under Small Sample

Bayesian Quantile Regression Based on the Empirical Likelihood with Spike and Slab Priors

Higher Accuracy for Bayesian and Frequentist Inference: Large Sample Theory for Small Sample Likelihood

Bayesian Nonparametric Weighted Sampling Inference

Neuronized Priors for Bayesian Sparse Linear Regression

Bayesian predictive inference when integrating a non-probability sample and a probability sample

Fused $L_{1/2}$ prior for large scale linear inverse problem with Gibbs bouncy particle sampler

Optimal post-selection inference for sparse signals: a nonparametric empirical-Bayes approach

Marginally Specified Priors for Nonparametric Bayesian Estimation

Sparse estimation of linear model via Bayesian method

Sparse Bayesian Linear Regression Using Generalized Normal Priors.

Bayesian analysis of constant-stress accelerated life test for the Weibull distribution using noninformative priors