Abstract:Resumen Este articulo ofrece un metodo estadistico para construir un capital a la manera de Piketty para China en un periodo largo (1952-2012), ampliando un stock de capital fisico productivo estrecho, con el fin de incorporar gradualmente inventarios y componentes no directamente productivos. Se denomina a este capital a la Piketty «stock de capital global», con una vision de economia abierta. Las elasticidades asociadas a este capital se estiman econometricamente con especificaciones que incluyen el capital humano, la investigacion y desarrollo, y una variable de cambio institucional, en el marco de modelos neoclasicos macrodinamicos modernos. Se calcula una tasa de retorno implicita de este capital para verificar (o no) lo que Piketty describe como una «desigualdad fundamental». Se valora su «ley economica» que conecta el coeficiente de capital con la ratio tasa de ahorro y tasa de crecimiento. Finalmente, se aborda el tema de las desigualdades en China hoy en dia. ABSTRACT This paper proposes a statistical method for building capital, after the manner of the French economist Thomas Piketty, for China during a long period (1952-2012), by increasing stock of limited productive, physical capital, with the aim of gradually including inventories and elements not directly concerned with production. This capital is called «stock of global capital» a la Piketty, with an open economic approach being taken. Elasticity of this capital is estimated econometrically by using such parameters as human capital, research and development, and institutional change as a variable, within the framework of modern macrodynamic, neoclassical models. An implicit rate of return on this capital is calculated with the aim of verifying (or not) what Piketty describes as an «inherent inequality». His «economic law» connecting capital coefficient with savings rate-to-growth rate ratio is assessed. Finally, the subject of inequalities in today’s China is dealt with.

From Communism to Capitalism: Private Versus Public Property and Inequality in China and Russia

Decomposition Analysis on Income Inequality in Urban China

The Wage Gap Between State And Private Enterprises In China: Counterfactual Analysis Based On Quantile Regression

Capital in the Twenty-First Century in China: Do Piketty's Laws Work in the Chinese Case?

Ownership Restructuring,Marketization and Wealth Inequality in Urban China:1995 and 2002

Capital in the twenty-first century in China

Piketty À Pékin. Les Lois Du Capital Au XXI E Siècle À L’épreuve De La Chine

Chinaâ€™s Increasing Inequality of Wealth: Piketty with Chinese Characteristics?

Income and Wealth Inequality in Hong Kong, 1981-2020: The Rise of Pluto-Communism?

Capital Income and Income Inequality: Evidence from Urban China

Accounting for Changes in Income Inequality in China, 2002-2018: Evidence from Household Survey Data

Emergence of income inequality: Origin, distribution and possible policies

Wealth Concentration among Residents under the Economic Financialisation in China

Different Paths? Human Capital Prices, Wages and Inequality in Canada and the U.S

Institutional Reforms and Household Wealth Inequality:A Property Transformation Perspective on China’s Housing Reform

Las Leyes Del Capital De Piketty En China, En El Siglo XXI/Thomas Piketty’s Laws of Capitalism in the Twenty-First Century in China

Property Transformation, Marketization and Wealth Inequality in Urban China: 1988, 1995 and 2002

Public Housing into Private Assets: Wealth Creation in Urban China

Property Tax and Housing Wealth Inequality: Evidence from China

The Increasing Inequality of Wealth in China

The Increasing Inequality of Wealth in China, 2002-2013