Comparative Influence of Bleeding and Ischemic Risk Factors on Diabetic Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Everolimus-Eluting Stents.

Ridhima Goel,Davide Cao,Rishi Chandiramani,Anastasios Roumeliotis,Moritz Blum,Deepak L. Bhatt,Dominick J. Angiolillo,Junbo Ge,Ashok Seth,Shigeru Saito,Mitchell Krucoff,Ken Kozuma,Rajendra M. Makkar,Sripal Bangalore,Lijuan Wang,Kai Koo,Franz-Josef Neumann,James Hermiller,Giulio Stefanini,Marco Valgimigli,Roxana Mehran
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29314
IF: 2.3
2020-01-01
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Abstract:Objective To investigate the impact of ischemic and bleeding risk factors on long-term clinical outcomes of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with everolimus-eluting stents. Background Second-generation drug-eluting stents have substantially improved outcomes after PCI in the general population; however, DM patients continue to experience high rates of ischemic and bleeding complications. Methods DM patients from the pooled XIENCE V registry were divided into high or low bleeding and ischemic risk groups (HBR, LBR, HIR, and LIR) based on established bleeding (age >= 75 years; chronic kidney disease; anemia; prior stroke; oral anticoagulation; thrombocytopenia; prior major bleeding) and ischemic (acute coronary syndrome; prior myocardial infarction [MI]; >= 3 stents implanted; >= 3 vessels treated; >= 3 lesions treated; stent length > 60 mm; bifurcation treated with >= 2 stents; chronic total occlusion) risk factors. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiac events (MACE; cardiac death, MI, or stent thrombosis) and major bleeding at 4-year follow-up. Results A total of 3,704 DM patients were divided into four groups (21.5% LBR/LIR; 39.0% LBR/HIR; 15.6% HBR/LIR; 23.9% HBR/HIR). Compared with LBR/LIR patients, those at HBR/HIR and HBR/LIR had a significantly higher risk of MACE (HR (95% CI) 2.7 (1.9-3.9) and 2.2 (1.5-3.2), respectively) and major bleeding (2.7 (1.6-4.8) and 2.6 (1.4-4.7), respectively), while LBR/HIR patients did not. Conclusions Among DM patients undergoing PCI, presence of bleeding risk factors was associated with a higher risk of both ischemic and bleeding events, whereas commonly used features of ischemic risk did not impact long-term clinical outcomes.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?