Abstract:OBJECTIVES The authors sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the NeoVas bioresorbable scaffold (BRS) compared with metallic drug-eluting stents. BACKGROUND BRS have the potential to improve very late outcomes compared with metallic drug-eluting stents, but some BRS have been associated with increased rates of device thrombosis before complete bioresorption. NeoVas is a new poly-L-lactic acid BRS that elutes sirolimus from a poly-D, L-lactide coating. METHODS Eligible patients with a single de novo native coronary artery lesion with a reference vessel diameter 2.5 to 3.75 mm and a lesion length <= 20 mm were randomized 1: 1 to NeoVas BRS versus cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES). Angiographic follow-up was performed in all patients at 1 year. The primary endpoint was angio-graphic in-segment late loss (LL), and the major secondary endpoint was the rate of angina. Baseline and follow-up optical coherence tomography and fractional flow reserve were performed in a pre-specified subgroup of patients. RESULTS The authors randomized 560 patients at 32 centers to treatment with NeoVas (n = 278) versus CoCr-EES (n = 282). One-year in-segment LL with NeoVas and CoCr-EES were 0.14 +/- 0.36 mm versus 0.11 +/- 0.34 mm (difference 0.03 mm; upper 1-sided 97.5% confidence interval 0.09 mm; p(noninferiority) < 0.0001; p(superiority) = 0.36). Clinical outcomes at 1 year were similar in the 2 groups, as were the rates of recurrent angina (27.9% vs. 32.1%; p = 0.26). Optical coherence tomography at 1 year demonstrated a higher proportion of covered struts (98.7% vs. 96.2%; p < 0.001), less strut malapposition (0% vs. 0.6%; p < 0.001), and a smaller minimal lumen area (4.71 +/- 1.64 vs. 6.00 +/- 2.15 mm(2); p < 0.001) with NeoVas compared with CoCr-EES respectively, with nonsignificant differences in fractional flow reserve (0.89 +/- 0.08 vs. 0.91 +/- 0.06; p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS The NeoVas BRS was noninferior to CoCr-EES for the primary endpoint of 1-year angiographic in-segment LL, and resulted in comparable 1-year clinical outcomes, including recurrent angina. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Left atrial appendage closure monitoring without sedation: a pilot study using intracardiac echocardiography through the oesophageal route.

Comparison of the “late Catch-Up” Phenomenon Between BuMA Supreme and XIENCE Stents Through Serial Optical Coherence Tomography at 1–2 Month and 2 Year Follow-Ups: A Multicenter Study

A randomized comparison of healing response of the BuMA Supreme stent and Xience stent at one- and two-month follow-up: PIONEER-II OCT randomized controlled trial.

A randomised comparison of a novel abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: clinical and angiographic follow-up of the TARGET I trial

Long‐term Clinical, Angiographic, and Intravascular Ultrasound Outcomes of Biodegradable Polymer‐coated Sirolimus‐eluting Stents

Design and Rationale of Targeted Therapy With a Sirolimus-Eluting, Biodegradable Polymer Coronary Stent in Chronic Total Occlusions (TARGET CTO): A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Noninferiority Trial.

Comparison of Long-Term In-Stent Vascular Response Between Abluminal Groove-Filled Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent and Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent: 3-Year OCT Follow-Up from the TARGET I Trial

Long-Term Effects of Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare Metal Stents on Patients with Acute St-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Outcomes of 3-Year Clinical Follow-Up

Post-dilatation Improves Stent Apposition in Patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Receiving Primary Percutaneous Intervention: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial Using Optical Coherence Tomography.

A prospective, multicenter, randomized OCT study of early neointimal condition at first and second months after BuMA Supreme stent versus XIENCE stent implantation in high-bleeding-risk coronary artery disease patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

AS-023: Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Non-Symmetrical, Biodegradable Polymer-Coated Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

First‐in‐man Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of a Second Generation Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus‐eluting Stent in the Treatment of Patients with De Novo Coronary Lesions: Clinical, Angiographic, and OCT Outcomes of CREDIT‐1

Effectiveness and safety of the sirolimus-eluting stents coated with bioabsorbable polymer coating in human coronary arteries.

Clinical and Angiographic Outcome after Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in Aorto-Ostial Lesions.

A Randomized Trial Comparing the NeoVas Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold and Metallic Everolimus-Eluting Stents.

Comparison of One-Year Clinical Outcomes Between Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Implantation of Drug-Eluting Stents for Left Main Lesions: A Single-Center Analysis of A 1,016-Patient Cohort

Assessment of an Asymmetrical Coating Stent with Sirolimus Released from Ablumial Matrix in Porcine Model

TCT-567 Long-Term Outcomes with an Abluminal Groove-Filled Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus a Cobalt-Chromium Everolimus-Eluting Stent in Single De Novo Coronary Lesions: Four-Year Results of the TARGET I Randomized Controlled Trial

Self-Apposing Stents in Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions: A Pilot Study

Comparison of the Absorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent (MiStent) to the Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent (Xience) (from the DESSOLVE I/II and ISAR-TEST-4 Studies)

A Randomised Comparison of Biodegradable Polymer- and Permanent Polymer-Coated Platinum-Chromium Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents in China: the EVOLVE China Study