Abstract:Breast cancer is a serious threat to women. Many machine learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) methods have been proposed for the early diagnosis of breast cancer based on histopathological images. Even though many such classification methods achieved high accuracy, many of them lack the explanation of the classification process. In this paper, we compare the performance of conventional machine learning (CML) against deep learning (DL)-based methods. We also provide a visual interpretation for the task of classifying breast cancer in histopathological images. For CML-based methods, we extract a set of handcrafted features using three feature extractors and fuse them to get image representation that would act as an input to train five classical classifiers. For DL-based methods, we adopt the transfer learning approach to the well-known VGG-19 deep learning architecture, where its pre-trained version on the large scale ImageNet, is block-wise fine-tuned on histopathological images. The evaluation of the proposed methods is carried out on the publicly available BreaKHis dataset for the magnification dependent classification of benign and malignant breast cancer and their eight sub-classes, and a further validation on KIMIA Path960, a magnification-free histopathological dataset with 20 image classes, is also performed. After providing the classification results of CML and DL methods, and to better explain the difference in the classification performance, we visualize the learned features. For the DL-based method, we intuitively visualize the areas of interest of the best fine-tuned deep neural networks using attention maps to explain the decision-making process and improve the clinical interpretability of the proposed models. The visual explanation can inherently improve the pathologist’s trust in automated DL methods as a credible and trustworthy support tool for breast cancer diagnosis. The achieved results show that DL methods outperform CML approaches where we reached an accuracy between 94.05% and 98.13% for the binary classification and between 76.77% and 88.95% for the eight-class classification, while for DL approaches, the accuracies range from 85.65% to 89.32% for the binary classification and from 63.55% to 69.69% for the eight-class classification.

LEARNING BINARY SEMANTIC EMBEDDING FOR BREAST HISTOLOGY IMAGE CLASSIFICATION AND RETRIEVAL

Learning Binary Semantic Embedding Forlarge-Scale Breast Histology Image Analysis.

Label-Efficient Breast Cancer Histopathological Image Classification

Breast Cancer Histopathological Image Classification Via Deep Active Learning And Confidence Boosting

Look, Investigate, and Classify: A Deep Hybrid Attention Method for Breast Cancer Classification

Multi-Label Chest X-Ray Image Classification via Semantic Similarity Graph Embedding

Improved Bald Eagle Search Optimization with Synergic Deep Learning-Based Classification on Breast Cancer Imaging

Medical image retrieval: Multiple regression models for user's search target

Conventional Machine Learning Versus Deep Learning for Magnification Dependent Histopathological Breast Cancer Image Classification: A Comparative Study with Visual Explanation

Improved Breast Cancer Diagnosis through Transfer Learning on Hematoxylin and Eosin Stained Histology Images

Deep Convolutional Hashing for Low-Dimensional Binary Embedding of Histopathological Images

Pathological Image Retrieval for Breast Cancer with pLSA Model

A Hybrid Deep Learning Model for Breast Cancer Detection and Classification

Breast cancer histopathological images classification based on deep semantic features and gray level co-occurrence matrix.

Rethinking Breast Cancer Diagnosis through Deep Learning Based Image Recognition

Application of Transfer Learning and Ensemble Learning in Image-level Classification for Breast Histopathology

Enhanced Dual Contrast Representation Learning with Cell Separation and Merging for Breast Cancer Diagnosis

Mammogram retrieval through machine learning within BI-RADS standards.

Toward Robust Histology-Prior Embedding for Endomicroscopy Image Classification

Spatially Resolved Gene Expression Prediction from H&E Histology Images via Bi-modal Contrastive Learning

Classification of Breast Cancer Histopathology Images using a Modified Supervised Contrastive Learning Method