Deep learning-based relapse prediction of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder with anti-aquaporin-4 antibody
Liang Wang,Lei Du,Qinying Li,Fang Li,Bei Wang,Yuanqi Zhao,Qiang Meng,Wenyu Li,Juyuan Pan,Junhui Xia,Shitao Wu,Jie Yang,Heng Li,Jianhua Ma,Jingzi ZhangBao,Wenjuan Huang,Xuechun Chang,Hongmei Tan,Jian Yu,Lei Zhou,Chuanzhen Lu,Min Wang,Qiang Dong,Jiahong Lu,Chongbo Zhao,Chao Quan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.947974
IF: 3.4
2022-08-06
Frontiers in Neurology
Abstract:Objective: We previously identified the independent predictors of recurrent relapse in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) with anti-aquaporin-4 antibody (AQP4-ab) and designed a nomogram to estimate the 1- and 2-year relapse-free probability, using the Cox proportional hazard (Cox-PH) model, assuming that the risk of relapse had a linear correlation with clinical variables. However, whether the linear assumption fits real disease tragedy is unknown. We aimed to employ deep learning and machine learning to develop a novel prediction model of relapse in patients with NMOSD and compare the performance with the conventional Cox-PH model. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with NMOSD with AQP4-ab in 10 study centers. In this study, 1,135 treatment episodes from 358 patients in Huashan Hospital were employed as the training set while 213 treatment episodes from 92 patients in nine other research centers as the validation set. We compared five models with added variables of gender, AQP4-ab titer, previous attack under the same therapy, EDSS score at treatment initiation, maintenance therapy, age at treatment initiation, disease duration, the phenotype of the most recent attack, and annualized relapse rate (ARR) of the most recent year by concordance index (C-index): conventional Cox-PH, random survival forest (RSF), LogisticHazard, DeepHit, and DeepSurv. Results: When including all variables, RSF outperformed the C-index in the training set (0.739), followed by DeepHit (0.737), LogisticHazard (0.722), DeepSurv (0.698), and Cox-PH (0.679) models. As for the validation set, the C-index of LogisticHazard outperformed the other models (0.718), followed by DeepHit (0.704), DeepSurv (0.698), RSF (0.685), and Cox-PH (0.651) models. Maintenance therapy was calculated to be the most important variable for relapse prediction. Conclusion: This study confirmed the superiority of deep learning to design a prediction model of relapse in patients with AQP4-ab-positive NMOSD, with the LogisticHazard model showing the best predictive power in validation.
neurosciences,clinical neurology