Predictive Factors of Central-Compartment Lymph Node Metastasis for Clinical N0 Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma With Strap Muscle Invasion.

Shuai Xue,Li Zhang,Renzhu Pang,Peisong Wang,Meishan Jin,Liang Guo,Yuhua Zhou,Bingfei Dong,Guang Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00511
IF: 6.055
2020-01-01
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Abstract:Background:Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) patients with anterior extrathyroidal extension (ETE) involving the strap muscle have a relatively better prognosis than those with posterior gross ETE involving the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Whether prophylactic central-compartment lymph node dissection (CLND) should be performed in PTCs with only strap muscle invasion (SMI) is still unclear. Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted in clinical N0 (cN0) PTC patients with SMI who underwent thyroid surgery from 2009 to 2017. A total of 152 patients were included, and predictive factors of central-compartment lymph node metastasis (CLNM) were determined. Results:Among the 281 PTCs patients with SMI, 152 (51.1%) did not clinically present with lymph node metastasis. Microscopic CLNM was identified in 77 (50.7%) cN0 PTC patients with SMI. According to the univariate and multivariate analyses, male patients and those aged 40 years (odds ratio [OR] = 6.22 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.43-27.10],p= 0.02 vs. OR = 9.94 [95% CI, 2.79-35.44],p= 0.00). The CLNM positive rate of male patients aged <40 years was 87.5%, while that for female patients aged >= 55 years was 23.8%. However, risk factors associated with large-volume CLNM were not identified because of the small number of patients. Conclusions:Taken together, nearly half of PTC patients with SMI did not clinically present with lymph node metastasis. Male sex and patients aged <40 years were identified as the predictive factors of CLNM in cN0 PTCs with SMI. Hence, the results of this single-center study raise the possibility that prophylactic CLND may be more often considered for younger male PTC patients with SMI.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?