Comparison of Primary Anastomosis and Staged Surgery in Emergency Treatment of Complicated Crohn's Disease

Rui Qing Liu,Dong Guo,Shuai Hua Qiao,Yi Yin,Zhen Guo,Jian Feng Gong,Yi Li,Wei Ming Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-2980.12949
2020-01-01
Journal of Digestive Diseases
Abstract:ObjectivesStaged surgery (SS) and primary anastomosis (PA) are alternatives to emergency surgery in Crohn's disease (CD). This study aimed to compare postoperative patient outcomes and medical cost of SS and PA for CD emergencies.MethodsConsecutive patients with CD undergoing emergency surgery between December 1997 and January 2017 in three centers were included. The PA and SS groups were compared regarding patient outcomes including postoperative complications and surgical recurrence, as well as hospitalization costs.ResultsAltogether 96 (39.5%) patients underwent an emergency PA, and 147 (60.5%) underwent an emergency SS. The incidence of intra‐abdominal septic complications (IASC) in the PA group was 15.6% compared with 7.5% in the SS group (P = 0.04). The length of hospitalization was longer (32.36 ± 1.76 d vs 19.33 ± 2.36 d, P <0.01) and the hospitalization cost was higher in the SS group (USD 15 811.1 ± 1697.1 vs USD 8345.3 ± 919.5, P <0.01) than the PA group. SS correlated with a lower surgical recurrence rate than PA (log‐rank test, P = 0.04). Presence of diffuse peritonitis, perforating or colonic disease, decision of operation choice made by a senior consultant and more than two concurrent surgical indications were related to the need for SS in emergencies. Localized peritonitis, body mass index (>18.5 kg/m2) and iatrogenic perforation were significantly associated with a low risk of IASC in the PA group.ConclusionSS can be performed with limited IASC and low surgical recurrence rates for surgical emergencies in CD, although it increases hospitalization costs and delays discharge.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?