Neighborhood-Level Redlining and Lending Bias Are Associated with Breast Cancer Mortality in a Large and Diverse Metropolitan Area.

Lindsay J. Collin,Anne H. Gaglioti,Kristen M. Beyer,Yuhong Zhou,Miranda A. Moore,Rebecca Nash,Jeffrey M. Switchenko,Jasmine M. Miller-Kleinhenz,Kevin C. Ward,Lauren E. McCullough
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-1038
2021-01-01
Abstract:BACKGROUND:Structural inequities have important implications for the health of marginalized groups. Neighborhood-level redlining and lending bias represent state-sponsored systems of segregation, potential drivers of adverse health outcomes. We sought to estimate the effect of redlining and lending bias on breast cancer mortality and explore differences by race.METHODS:Using Georgia Cancer Registry data, we included 4,943 non-Hispanic White (NHW) and 3,580 non-Hispanic Black (NHB) women with a first primary invasive breast cancer diagnosis in metro-Atlanta (2010-2014). Redlining and lending bias were derived for census tracts using the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act database. We calculated hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the associations of redlining, lending bias on breast cancer mortality and estimated race-stratified associations.RESULTS:Overall, 20% of NHW and 80% of NHB women lived in redlined census tracts, and 60% of NHW and 26% of NHB women lived in census tracts with pronounced lending bias. Living in redlined census tracts was associated with a nearly 1.60-fold increase in breast cancer mortality (hazard ratio = 1.58; 95% CI, 1.37-1.82) while residing in areas with substantial lending bias reduced the hazard of breast cancer mortality (hazard ratio = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.99). Among NHB women living in redlined census tracts, we observed a slight increase in breast cancer mortality (hazard ratio = 1.13; 95% CI, 0.90-1.42); among NHW women the association was more pronounced (hazard ratio = 1.39; 95% CI, 1.09-1.78).CONCLUSIONS:These findings underscore the role of ecologic measures of structural racism on cancer outcomes.IMPACT:Place-based measures are important contributors to health outcomes, an important unexplored area that offers potential interventions to address disparities.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?